PARTIE 2 - Icomos

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Theme 2 Session 3 References Models of urban development: examples in Bologna Bocchi F., 1995, Atlante Storico di Bologna, Bologna. Bocchi F., 1990, I portici di Bologna e l’edilizia civile e medievale, Bologna. Fanti M., 1974, Le vie di Bologna. Saggio di toponomastica storica, Bologna. Fabbri G., 1955, Le fortificazioni del Medioevo a Bologna, Bologna. Finelli A., 1929, Bologna ai tempi che vi soggiornò Dante, Bologna. Guidicini G., 1869-73, Cose notabili della città di Bologna, ossia storia cronologica de' suoi stabili, pubblici e privati, Bologna, vol. 5. Ricci G., 1980, Bologna – Le città nella storia d’Italia, Editori Laterza, Bari. Rivani G., 1966, Le torri di Bologna, Bologna. Tuttle R.J., 2001, Piazza Maggiore. Studi su Bologna nel cinquecento, Venezia. Zucchini G., 1954, Edifici di Bologna, vol. I, Roma, 1931; vol. II. 389 LE PATRIMOINE, MOTEUR DE DÉVELOPPEMENT HERITAGE, DRIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
Theme 2 Session 3 FROM CONTINUITY TO CONTRAST: DIVERSE APPROACHES TO DESIGN IN HISTORIC CONTEXTS Communication non présentée Paper not presented Robert J. Hotes AIA, LEED AP Associate / Restoration Group Leader, Klein and Hoffman, Inc. Philadelphia, USA rhotes@kleinandhoffman.com Abstract. In the United States, the often inherent conflict between compatibility and differentiation when dealing with new design in historic contexts is embodied in Standard 9 of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The National Park Service policy on new additions, adopted in 1967, is an outgrowth and continuation of a general philosophical approach to change first expressed by John Ruskin in England in the 1850s, formalized by William Morris in the founding of the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings in 1877, expanded by the Society in 1924 and, finally, reiterated in the 1964 Venice Charter – a document that continues to be followed by sixty-four national committees of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). The 1967 Administrative Policies for Historical Areas of the National Park System thus states, "...a modern addition should be readily distinguishable from the older work; however, the new work should be harmonious with the old in scale, proportion, materials, and color. Such additions should be as inconspicuous as possible from the public view." Similarly, Standard 9 of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation from 1977 states the following: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Three decades after the drafting of the Standards, the issue of how to intervene within historic settings remains a subject of intense debate in the profession. Interpretation of the Standards by preservation authorities and practicing architects alike has been varied and, at times, contradictory. My research as the 2011 Richard Morris Hunt Fellow will explore the range of viewpoints in France on the design of additions and new construction in historic contexts, and this paper will present projects showing a variety of attitudes toward the pre-existing context, from stylistic continuity to striking contrast The projects—representing leading preservation architects—will illustrate diverse methodologies, approaches and degrees to which architects and preservation professionals either conform to or challenge the issue of compatibility vs. differentiation. Preservation questions are almost always regional or local in nature, since they require judgments about historic character rather than universal or abstract forms. By exploring diverse approaches to this issue, it is possible to acquire a new perspective on how this seeming contradiction might be resolved in practice both in the United States and abroad. In addition, the most pressing issue in urbanism today is sustainability, and the re-compaction and re-urbanization of our existing cities will inevitably be part of our response. The interface between historic environments and new construction then becomes a crucial issue for architects and preservation professionals committed to a sustainable future. 390 LE PATRIMOINE, MOTEUR DE DÉVELOPPEMENT HERITAGE, DRIVER OF DEVELOPMENT
Page 1 and 2:
THEME 2 introduction Président de
Page 3 and 4:
THEME 2 introduction Theme Chair DE
Page 5 and 6:
Theme 2 Session 1 INTRODUCTION Vice
Page 7 and 8:
Theme 2 Session 1 ARTISANAT, METIER
Page 9 and 10:
Theme 2 Session 1 Artisanat, métie
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Theme 2 Session 1 L’Europe des An
Page 21 and 22:
Theme 2 Session 1 Barthélémy J _
Page 23 and 24:
Theme 2 Session 1 Escuela Taller :
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Theme 2 Session 1 Maintien des pays
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Theme 2 Session 1 CULTURE OF WOOD :
Page 41 and 42:
Theme 2 Session 1 Culture of Wood :
Page 43 and 44:
Theme 2 Session 1 Culture of Wood :
Page 45 and 46:
Theme 2 Session 1 References Cultur
Page 47 and 48:
Theme 2 Session 1 LES MAISONS À PA
Page 49 and 50:
Theme 2 Session 1 Les maisons à pa
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Theme 2 Session 1 pluvieux. On pour
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Theme 2 Session 1 References Les ma
Page 71 and 72:
Theme 2 Session 1 THE IMPACTS OF TH
Page 73 and 74:
Theme 2 Session 1 The Impacts of th
Page 75 and 76:
Theme 2 Session 1 The Impacts of th
Page 77 and 78:
Theme 2 Session 1 THE MACUTI HOUSE,
Page 79 and 80:
Theme 2 Session 1 The Macuti House,
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Theme 2 Session 1 RAPPORT Rapporteu
Page 89 and 90:
Theme 2 Session 2 INTRODUCTION Vice
Page 91 and 92:
Theme 2 Session 2 HERITAGE CONSERVA
Page 93 and 94:
Theme 2 Session 2 DU DIAGNOSTIC ENE
Page 95 and 96:
Theme 2 Session 2 Measurements and
Page 97 and 98:
Theme 2 Session 2 Measurements and
Page 99 and 100:
Theme 2 Session 2 La pierre naturel
Page 101 and 102:
Theme 2 Session 2 La pierre naturel
Page 103 and 104: Theme 2 Session 2 References La pie
Page 105 and 106: Theme 2 Session 2 Adobe constructio
Page 107 and 108: Theme 2 Session 2 UN TERRAIN D’AP
Page 109 and 110: Theme 2 Session 2 Un terrain d’ap
Page 115 and 116: Theme 2 Session 2 Old and green: en
Page 117 and 118: Theme 2 Session 2 buildings are sho
Page 119 and 120: Theme 2 Session 2 Old and green: en
Page 121 and 122: Theme 2 Session 2 cultural attitude
Page 123 and 124: Theme 2 Session 2 Examination of th
Page 129 and 130: Theme 2 Session 2 References Examin
Page 131 and 132: Theme 2 Session 2 Le patrimoine bâ
Page 133 and 134: Theme 2 Session 2 L’ÉLOGE DES R
Page 135 and 136: Theme 2 Session 2 L’éloge des r
Page 137 and 138: Theme 2 Session 2 L’éloge des r
Page 139 and 140: Theme 2 Session 2 Photo N° 5 : Fer
Page 141 and 142: Theme 2 Session 2 RAPPORT Rapporteu
Page 143 and 144: Theme 2 Session 3 INTRODUCTION Vice
Page 145 and 146: Theme 2 Session 3 MODELS OF URBAN D
Page 147 and 148: Theme 2 Session 3 Models of urban d
Page 153: Theme 2 Session 3 Models of urban d
Page 157 and 158: Theme 2 Session 3 From Continuity t
Page 163 and 164: Theme 2 Session 3 TORONTO BROWNFIEL
Page 165 and 166: Theme 2 Session 3 Toronto Brownfiel
Page 177 and 178: Theme 2 Session 3 ADAPTIVE REUSE OF
Page 179 and 180: Theme 2 Session 3 Adaptive re-use o
Page 181 and 182: Theme 2 Session 3 ART DE BATIR ET D
Page 183 and 184: Theme 2 Session 3 Art de bâtir et
Page 189 and 190: Theme 2 Session 3 References Art de
Page 191 and 192: Theme 2 Session 3 The Past for the
Page 193 and 194: Theme 2 Session 3 12. Cho, In-Souk
Page 195 and 196: Theme 2 Session 3 La construction e
Page 203 and 204: Theme 2 Session 3 ECO-PLASTERS REVI
Page 205 and 206:
Theme 2 Session 3 Eco-plasters revi
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Theme 2 Session 3 TABLE 2. Size dis
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Theme 2 Session 3 UNE MEILLEURE EFF
Page 221 and 222:
Theme 2 Session 3 Une meilleure eff
Page 223 and 224:
Theme 2 Session 3 NOUVELLE RÉFLEXI
Page 225 and 226:
Theme 2 Session 3 Nouvelle réflexi
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Theme 2 Session 3 RAPPORT Rapporteu
Page 239 and 240:
Theme 2 Session 3 REPORT ADAPTING T
Page 241 and 242:
THEME 2 conclusion Président de Th
Page 243 and 244:
les pratiques les plus durables, qu
Page 245 and 246:
THEME 2 conclusion DEVELOPMENT OR A
Page 247:
Annick DANEELS (La construction en
show all

PARTIE 2 - Icomos

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?