16. Chien LY, Chou YH, Ko YL, Lee CF: Health-related quality of life among 3--4-year-old children born with verylow birthweight. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56(1): 9-16.17. Fekkes M, Theunissen NC, Brugman E, et al.: Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: ahealth-related quality of life instrument for 1-5-year-old children. Qual Life Res 2000; 9(8): 961-72.18. Delobel-Ayoub M, Kaminski M, Marret S, et al.: Behavioral outcome at 3 years of age in very preterminfants: the EPIPAGE study. Pediatrics 2006; 117(6): 1996-2005.19. Reijneveld SA, <strong>de</strong> K<strong>le</strong>ine MJ, van Baar AL, et al.: Behavioural and emotional prob<strong>le</strong>ms in very preterm andvery low birthweight infants at age 5 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91(6): F423-8.20. Whitaker AH, Van Rossem R, Feldman JF, et al.: Psychiatric outcomes in low-birth-weight children at age 6years: relation to neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54(9): 847-56.21. Sykes DH, Hoy EA, Bill JM, McClure BG, Halliday HL, Reid MM: Behavioural adjustment in school of very lowbirthweight children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997; 38(3): 315-25.22. Samara M, Marlow N, Wolke D: Pervasive behavior prob<strong>le</strong>ms at 6 years of age in a total-population samp<strong>le</strong>of children born at
31. Garel M, Bahuaud M, Blon<strong>de</strong>l B: [Consequences for the family of a very preterm birth two months afterdischarge. Results of the EPIPAGE qualitative study.]. Arch Pediatr 2004; 11(11): 1299-307.32. Garel M, Dar<strong>de</strong>nnes M, Blon<strong>de</strong>l B: Mothers' psychological distress 1 year after very preterm childbirth.Results of the EPIPAGE qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev 2007; 33(2): 137-43.33. Pope S, watts J, Evans SF, McDonald SJ, Hen<strong>de</strong>rson J: Postnatal <strong>de</strong>pression: a systematic review ofpublished scientific literature to 1999: Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia National Health and MedicalResearch Concil, 2000.34. Hagan R, Evans SF, Pope S: Preventing postnatal <strong>de</strong>pression in mothers of very preterm infants: arandomised control<strong>le</strong>d trial. Bjog 2004; 111(7): 641-7.35. Carter JD, Mul<strong>de</strong>r RT, Bartram AF, Darlow BA: Infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: parental response.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90(2): F109-13.36. Singer LT, Salvator A, Guo S, Collin M, Lilien L, Ba<strong>le</strong>y J: Maternal psychological distress and parenting stressafter the birth of a very low-birth-weight infant. Jama 1999; 281(9): 799-805.37. Holditch-Davis D, Bart<strong>le</strong>tt TR, Blickman AL, Mi<strong>le</strong>s MS: Posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers ofpremature infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003; 32(2): 161-71.38. Saylor CF, Boyce GC, Price C: Early predictors of school-age behavior prob<strong>le</strong>ms and social skills in childrenwith intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and/or extremely low birthweight (ELBW). Child Psychiatry Hum Dev2003; 33(3): 175-92.39. Assel MA, Landry SH, Swank PR, Steelman L, Mil<strong>le</strong>r-Loncar C, Smith KE: How do mothers' childrearinghistories, stress and parenting affect children's behavioural outcomes? Child Care Health Dev 2002; 28(5): 359-68.40. Singer LT, Fulton S, Kirchner HL, et al.: Parenting very low birth weight children at school age: maternalstress and coping. J Pediatr 2007; 151(5): 463-9.41. Saigal S, Burrows E, Stoskopf BL, Rosenbaum PL, Streiner D: Impact of extreme prematurity on families ofado<strong>le</strong>scent children. J Pediatr 2000; 137(5): 701-6.42. Wolke D, Sohne B, Ohrt B, Riegel K: Follow-up of preterm children: important to <strong>document</strong> dropouts.Lancet 1995; 345(8947): 447.70
- Page 7 and 8:
REMERCIEMENTSBien que leurs noms ne
- Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTIONAu cours des dernières
- Page 11 and 12:
L’influence de la prématurité e
- Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTIONL’accouchement préma
- Page 15 and 16:
Tableau 2Statistiques de survie des
- Page 17 and 18:
indiquent que l’obésité réduir
- Page 19 and 20: Tableau 5Percentiles des poids (g)
- Page 21 and 22: détresse respiratoire que les peti
- Page 23 and 24: confirmée par plusieurs autres ess
- Page 25 and 26: Références1. Reed DM, Stanley FJ:
- Page 27 and 28: 32. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Ngai C,
- Page 29 and 30: L’influence de la prématurité e
- Page 31 and 32: laboratoire du Dr Yves Tremblay. El
- Page 33 and 34: Introductionlusieurs paramètres pe
- Page 35 and 36: Le canal artériel crée une joncti
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 1. Histologie du poumon de s
- Page 39 and 40: cette variation allélique. D’aut
- Page 41 and 42: Chez le rat, la DHT réduit, dans d
- Page 43 and 44: les mécanismes subtils de la matur
- Page 45 and 46: Signaux de communication entre le m
- Page 47 and 48: FONDEMENTS BIOMÉDICAUX DES THÉRAP
- Page 49 and 50: L’OCCLUSION TRACHÉALECette techn
- Page 51 and 52: 16. Derin, B.G., et al., Immunohist
- Page 53 and 54: 49. Nielsen, H.C., H.M. Zinman, and
- Page 55 and 56: 80. Bahasadri, S. and N. Changizi,
- Page 57 and 58: 111. Tremblay, L.O., et al., Respir
- Page 59 and 60: L’influence de la prématurité e
- Page 61 and 62: INTRODUCTIONAlors que les médias n
- Page 63 and 64: scolaire professionnelle et ils ont
- Page 65 and 66: l’âge de 6 ans présenteraient a
- Page 67 and 68: S’il s’agit en plus d'un enfant
- Page 69: RÉFÉRENCES1. O'Shea TM, Kuban KC,
- Page 73 and 74: PRÉSENTATION DE L'AUTEUREMireille
- Page 75 and 76: non) et selon les décisions prises
- Page 77 and 78: L’ÊTRE HUMAIN ET LA SÉLECTION N
- Page 79 and 80: pratiques aient évolué depuis ce
- Page 81 and 82: survivants soient disponibles, des
- Page 83 and 84: de certitude scientifique sur les r
- Page 85 and 86: LA PLACE DES PARENTSPlusieurs group
- Page 87 and 88: l’équipe soignante. Dans ces mom
- Page 89 and 90: ANNEXE 1Définitions de concepts cl
- Page 91 and 92: 17. Chervenak, F. A., McCullough, L
- Page 93 and 94: REMERCIEMENTS DE LA PART DE L'AUTEU
- Page 95 and 96: INTRODUCTIONÀ mesure que les progr
- Page 97 and 98: dans l’affaire Tremblay c. Daigle
- Page 99 and 100: La viabilité est conditionnelle à
- Page 101 and 102: consentement aux soins du prématur
- Page 103 and 104: libre et éclairé 52 ;Nul ne peut
- Page 105 and 106: sont uniques selon son âge et sa c
- Page 107 and 108: 18 Tremblay c. Daigle, [1989] 2 R.C
- Page 109 and 110: 45 Robert P.KOURI, Suzanne PHILIPS-
- Page 111 and 112: L’influence de la prématurité e
- Page 113 and 114: critères de nature clinique et ép
- Page 115 and 116: qualité de vie acceptable. Ainsi,
- Page 117 and 118: RÉFÉRENCESOuvrages générauxVers