qarTuli wignis mxardaWeris fondi

104 waxnagi 1.2009
med maTi miznisaken swrafva gacilebiT mets gulisxmobs:
aq saqme exeba am WeSmaritebis Tqmasa da Txzvas mxatvrul-
SemoqmedebiTi TvalsazrisiT srulyofili, uCveulod
axleburi, enobriv TamaSebSi garTuli eniT.
aq Slaiermaxeris sityvebi rom moviSvelioT, “azrovnebis
xelovneba” da “saubris xelovneba” idealur harmonias
qmnian, vinaidan “saubari mxolod qmnil azrs warmoadgens”
(“die Rede nur der gewordene Gedanke ist”) 34 . aqedan gamomdinare,
azrovneba ukve mxolod wminda filosofiur saqmed ki aRar
warmoCndeba, aramed xelovnebis sferoSi gadadis.
amgvarad, daskvnis saxiT SeiZleba iTqvas, rom herderisa
da goeTesgan nasesxebi “zrunvis” simbolika Tomas manis
“jadosnur mTaSi” sintagmatur doneze romanis enobriv
qargaSi ostaturad Caqsovil, damoukideblad moqmed,
miTosuri fonis matarebel urTierTSewyobil sityvaTa
jgufad anu sintagmad, xolo haidegeris naSromSi ki paradigmatul
doneze cnebad qceul paradigmad mogvevlineba.
Nino Pirtskhalava
The history of reception of the Cura fable in literature and
philosophy
The analysis of the function of different myths, legends, symbols in the
work of Herder and Goethe, who later had an exeptionally strong influence
on the poetical and philosophical work of such Occidental artists and thinkers
of the 20th century, as Thomas Mann (“The Magic Mountain”) and Martin
Heidegger (“Being and Time”), allows us to gain a totally new prospect
of modern literature and philosophy.
As the definite example of this circumstance could serve the motive of
anxiety (Sorge), which is an eminent example for the illustration of the history
of reception of the Cura fable in European literature and philosophy.
The examination of the phenomenon of anxiety as of a deeply symbolical
mythological figure has a quite long tradition in poetry, goes back to antiquity.
Goethe became acquainted with the Cura fable of the Latin poet Hyginus
through the adaptation of this fable by Herder in his poem “The child of
Anxiety” and used it in his “Faust”, thus becoming one of the main sources
of influence for the conceptions of Heidegger and Thomas Mann.
34.
Schleiermacher Fr., Werke in 4 Bdn., 1981, Bd.4, S. 138.