26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scientific Review Panel Draft February, 2012<br />

was from a soil sample with about 710 µg Cr(VI) per g soil and contained<br />

chromate crystals on the soil surface. The contaminated soil probably represents<br />

a matrix described by Bartlett (1991) in which high concentrations of Cr(VI)<br />

exhausted the readily available reducing power of the soil and excess Cr(VI)<br />

persists on the soil surface without being reduced. Thus, multiplying 2.9% by<br />

0.83 and rounded to the nearest whole number provides an ABS point estimate<br />

of 2% <strong>for</strong> Cr(VI) from soil vehicle.<br />

The Hot Spots risk assessment procedures have previously assumed no<br />

reduction of deposited Cr(VI) because typically Cr(VI) deposition is modeled<br />

without soil sampling monitoring <strong>for</strong> the Cr(VI)/Cr(III) ratio and without an<br />

evaluation of the redox potential of the soil. This assumption may result in<br />

overestimation of Cr(VI) soil concentrations in situations where Cr(VI) is readily<br />

reduced to Cr(III). Bioaccessibility is determined in part by the Cr(VI)/Cr(III) ratio.<br />

The use of soil with high concentrations of Cr(VI) to determine bioaccessibility is<br />

not likely to underestimate bioaccessibility under the conditions typically found in<br />

Hot Spots risk assessments, where Cr(VI) is deposited over a long period of time<br />

and typically results in lower soil concentrations than the 710 µg/g observed in<br />

the study by Wainman et al. (1994).<br />

A Limitations <strong>for</strong> the ABS not discussed above include lack of a factor <strong>for</strong><br />

absorbed chromium lost through skin desquamation. Studies show that some<br />

Cr(VI) will be reduced to Cr(III) in skin and bind to cellular constituents<br />

(Gammelgaard et al., 1992; Hostynek, 2003). If this occurs in the stratum<br />

corneum, the chromium will likely be removed through desquamation be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

systemic absorption can occur. Another limitation includes reliance on studies in<br />

which Cr(VI) is applied directly onto the skin (i.e., neat), rather than combined<br />

with soil, <strong>for</strong> estimation of fractional dermal absorption. Kissel (2011) has noted<br />

that fractional absorption is dependent on skin loading conditions <strong>for</strong> application<br />

of organic chemicals directly to skin. However, Baranowska-Dutkiewicz (1981)<br />

showed that <strong>for</strong> Cr(VI) the flux through skin increases proportionally with<br />

increasing Cr(VI) load applied to skin, resulting similar fractional absorption<br />

values independent of load onto skin. The constraints in estimating fractional<br />

absorption <strong>for</strong> organic chemicals applied neat, which assumes a constant flux<br />

through skin, does not appear to be relevant <strong>for</strong> the metal salt Cr(VI).<br />

F.3.5 Fluoride and Soluble Fluoride Compounds<br />

Recommended use of default inorganic compound ABS estimate of 13.0%.<br />

F.3.5.1 Studies Considered<br />

Excessive exposure to the negatively charged fluoride ion deposited on soil as<br />

an aerosol or as a soluble inorganic fluoride salt is known to have toxic effects in<br />

animals through ingestion of contaminated soil (Eagers, 1969). However, no<br />

quantitative data could be found regarding the fractional dermal absorption of<br />

F-30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!