Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 2012 Table H.11-1 Lead field studies on leafy crops. tissue Uptake Uptake soil tissue conc dry-to- factor factor conc soil conc conta Uptake wet wt (contam) (contam) bckd conc bckg m dry factor conver- wet wt ww (mg/ contam Crop dry wt wt (contam) sion plant/dw plant/wet Study Type kg) (mg/kg) Name mg/kg mg/kg dry wt factor soil w soil Reference sewage sludge-field 21.1 67.4 spinach 0.33 1.2 0.0200 0.08 0.001 0.00125 Jamali et al., 2007 mining, smelting-field 223.22 cabbage 0.0500 0.08 0.004 0.005 Li et al., 2006 mining, smelting-field 223.22 cabbage Chinese 0.0490 0.08 0.0039 0.004875 Li et al., 2006 mining, smelting-field 223.22 cabbage 0.0780 0.08 0.0062 0.00775 Li et al., 2006 mining, smelting-field 223.22 spinach 0.0700 0.08 0.0056 0.007 Li et al., 2006 field 14.48 amaranth 1.91 0.1319 0.08 0.010552 0.0131906 Liu et al. 2006 field 14.48 cabbage 1 0.0691 0.08 0.005525 0.0069061 Liu et al. 2006 field 14.48 celery Chinese 1.76 0.1215 0.08 0.009724 0.0121547 Liu et al. 2006 field 14.48 cabbage Chinese 2.05 0.1416 0.08 0.011326 0.0141575 Liu et al. 2006 field 14.48 chive 2.53 0.1747 0.08 0.013978 0.0174724 Liu et al. 2006 field 14.48 pakchoi 2.02 0.1395 0.08 0.01116 0.0139503 Liu et al. 2006 pot 18.5 2897 Radish 2.9 94.3 0.0326 0.047 0.00153 0.0019124 Mathe-Gaspar and Anton 2002 pot 18.5 2897 Radish 2.4 272.4 0.0940 0.047 0.004419 0.0055242 Mathe-Gaspar and Anton 2002 sewage sludge - field 775 cabbage swiss 0.31 0.0004 0.08 0.00003 0.0000375 Muntau et al., 1987 drilling fluid-grnhs Env. contam. Soil (paint?) - potted - 17 1131 chard 1.7 9.2 0.0080 0.08 0.0007 0.000875 Nelson et al., 1984 grnhs Env. contam. Soil (paint?) - potted - 2000 collard 8 0.0040 0.147 0.0006 0.00075 Nicklow et al., (1983) grnhs Env. contam. Soil (paint?) - potted - 2000 kale 7 0.0035 0.173 0.0006 0.00075 Nicklow et al., 1983 grnhs 2000 lettuce amaranth 25 0.0125 0.049 0.000613 0.0007656 Nicklow et al., 1983 indust. Poll. Depo. - field 165.85 us 18.44 0.1100 0.08 0.0088 0.011 Pandey and Pandey, 2009 indust. Poll. Depo. - field 165.85 spinach 19.58 0.1200 0.08 0.0096 0.012 Pandey and Pandey, 2009 sewage sludge-field 98 lettuce Swiss 0.0200 0.05 0.001 0.00125 Preer et al., 1995 sewage sludge-field 98 chard 0.0300 0.08 0.003 0.00375 Preer et al., 1995 smelter area - urban gardens - field 84 872 lettuce 2.24 6.93 0.0079 0.049 0.000387 0.0004839 Pruvot et al., 2006 H-32
SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 2012 Table H.11-1 Lead field studies on leafy crops. soil conc bckd (mg/ kg) soil conc contam Crop (mg/kg) Name 1000 lettuce 130 lettuce tissue conc bckg dry wt mg/kg tissue conc conta m dry wt mg/kg H-33 Uptake factor (contam) dry wt dry-towet wt conversion factor Uptake factor (contam) wet wt plant/dw soil Uptake factor (contam) ww plant/wet w soil Reference Study Type landfill-field 1.3 0.0013 0.05 0.000065 8.125E-05 Samsoe-Petersen et al., 2002 moderate urban poll -field 0.25 0.0020 0.05 0.0001 0.000125 Samsoe-Petersen et al., 2002 field-wastewater 0.32 2.04 basil garden 0.18 0.84 0.4100 0.08 0.033 0.04125 Shariatpanahi and Anderson 1986 field-wastewater 0.32 2.04 cress 0.16 0.8 0.3900 0.08 0.031 0.03875 Shariatpanahi and Anderson 1986 field-wastewater 0.32 2.04 mint 0.29 0.78 0.3800 0.08 0.031 0.03875 Shariatpanahi and Anderson 1986 field-wastewater 0.32 2.04 tarragon 0.15 0.68 0.3300 0.08 0.027 0.03375 Shariatpanahi and Anderson 1986 flooded gardens 85.2 sorrel 0.99 0.0116 0.08 0.00093 0.001162 Sipter et al. 2008 non-flooded gardens 27.8 sorrel 0.295 0.0106 0.08 0.000849 0.0010612 Sipter et al. 2008 sewage sludge-field spinach amaranth 0.08 0.00048 0.0006 Sridhara Chary et al., 2008 Indust. sewage wastes - field 3.4 183.5 us 0.12 12.2 0.0660 0.08 0.0054 0.00675 Srikanth et al., 1991 Indust. sewage wastes - field 3.4 183.5 cabbage 0.64 7.52 0.0410 0.078 0.0032 0.004 Srikanth et al., 1991 Indust. sewage wastes - field 3.4 183.5 spinach 0.05 14.94 0.0810 0.086 0.007 0.00875 Srikanth et al., 1991 urban gardens-field-to-grnhs 12 1601 lettuce Chinese 2.22 8.67 0.0080 0.045 0.00036 0.00045 Sterrett et al., 1996 field 71.31 cabbage 0.65 0.0091 0.08 0.000729 0.0009115 Wang et al. 2006 field 71.31 Pakchoi Water 0.7625 0.0107 0.08 0.000855 0.0010693 Wang et al. 2006 field 71.31 spinach 1.2125 0.0170 0.08 0.00136 0.0017003 Wang et al. 2006 field 400.3 Pakchoi 3.28 0.0680 0.08 0.00544 0.0068 Yan et al. 2007 field - smelter 21.6 319.6 leek Chinese 0.2760 0.08 0.02208 0.0276 Zheng et al. 2007a field - smelter 158 cabbage green 0.055 0.018 0.023 Zheng et al. 2007b field - smelter 297 onion 0.085 0.006 0.008 Zheng et al. 2007b field - smelter 297 spinach 0.088 0.025 0.03 Zheng et al. 2007b field - smelter 139 celery 0.058 0.016 0.02 Zheng et al. 2007b field - smelter 111 cabbage 0.052 0.019 0.024 Zheng et al. 2007b field - smelter 111 lettuce 0.042 0.024 0.03 Zheng et al. 2007b field - smelter 167 mustard 0.071 0.021 0.026 Zheng et al. 2007b Average lead uptake factor in leafy crops (fresh weight conc. in plant / wet weight conc. in soil) = 0.0077±0.0104
Page 1 and 2:
SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 20
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
SRPcientific Review Panel Draft Ver
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Scientific Review Panel Draft Febru
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164: SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 20
Page 213: SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 20
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Ve
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
show all

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?