26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scientific Review Panel Draft February, 2012<br />

60 times the weight fraction of organic carbon. The models were then used to<br />

estimate the relative effect of changing exposure conditions (e.g., changes in soil<br />

loading, contamination levels, chemical, etc.) compared to published<br />

experimental studies. Although the models were generally consistent with the<br />

experimental results <strong>for</strong> some chemicals, such as benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), they<br />

were considerably divergent from the experimental results <strong>for</strong> other chemicals,<br />

such as lindane (gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane).<br />

The authors suggested that the fast soil release kinetics on which the models are<br />

based may not fit with what was observed experimentally <strong>for</strong> some chemicals<br />

(Bunge and Parks, 1997). Fast soil release kinetics assumes the primary<br />

resistance that controls transfer of the chemical from soil to skin resides in the<br />

dermal barrier, and that the kinetics of soil desorption are relatively insignificant.<br />

Lindane may exhibit slow soil release characteristics in various soils (i.e., soil<br />

desorption of the chemical is the controlling influence <strong>for</strong> dermal absorption),<br />

which limits the amount of dermal absorption predicted by the models.<br />

Alternatively, Shatkin et al. (2002) developed a two-stage fugacity-based model<br />

specifically <strong>for</strong> BaP that incorporated both a fast soil desorption phase and a slow<br />

desorption phase of BaP from soil. Based on the several parameters<br />

investigated that would affect dermal bioavailability, the authors predicted that<br />

the fast desorption kinetics of a soil had a greater impact on predicted dermal<br />

uptake than any other parameter, including organic carbon content of a soil.<br />

These examples show that the effect of soil on the dermal uptake of organic<br />

compounds can be difficult to predict without experimental data. However,<br />

dermal absorption by metal salts can be expected to be a more complex process<br />

than dermal absorption of organic compounds. Factors affecting absorption of<br />

soil-bound metals include pH, metal oxidation state, counter ion, size and<br />

solubility (Hostynek, 2003). For example, lead becomes more soluble and<br />

available <strong>for</strong> uptake in soil at low pH. However, a low soil pH tends to convert<br />

chromium (VI) to the larger less permeable chromium (III) ion. This reduction in<br />

chromium valence can also occur in transit through the skin and considerably<br />

slow the absorption of chromium through skin.<br />

F.2.4 Effect of Soil Organic Content on Dermal Absorption<br />

For the soil pollutants discussed in this section, one of the most common soil<br />

variables explored <strong>for</strong> effect on dermal absorption of a chemical is the organic<br />

carbon or organic matter content. The chemical adsorbed to the organic carbon<br />

phase will generally be less available <strong>for</strong> transfer to skin than neat chemical<br />

present in a separate liquid phase in the soil, largely due to strong adsorption of<br />

the chemical to the organic carbon fraction (Bunge and Parks, 1996). Dermal<br />

bioavailability of a chemical in soil also tends to decrease with increasing organic<br />

carbon content of the soil (Sheppard and Evenden, 1994; Bunge and Parks,<br />

1997). Consequently, a number of studies compared the effect of varying the<br />

F-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!