26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Version 2 February,June 2012<br />

Similar to the inhalation Tco derivation, limitations of the oral Tco derivations<br />

include the small number of women examined <strong>for</strong> PAHs in mother’s milk (n=21)<br />

and the large number of “below detection limit” results <strong>for</strong> milk concentrations,<br />

particularly <strong>for</strong> the larger PAHs with more than four rings. <strong>OEHHA</strong> assumed that<br />

the arithmetic estimates, minimum and maximum values reported by<br />

investigators represented a lognormal distribution and converted estimates from<br />

arithmetic to geometric. Nevertheless, the use of sparse data to derive an<br />

inhalation Tco and data from potentially two different study populations to<br />

generate an oral Tco – one <strong>for</strong> dietary PAH intake and another <strong>for</strong> mother’s milk<br />

PAH concentrations - introduces considerable uncertainty.<br />

J.3.3 Comparison and Use of Inhalation and Oral PAH Tcos<br />

Comparison of the oral and inhalation Tcos also presents a number of interesting<br />

findings. For example, comparing the averaged inhalation and oral mother’s milk<br />

Tcos generated from the Italian studies <strong>for</strong> carcinogenic PAHs, the mean<br />

inhalation Tco is about four times greater than the oral Tcos based on Italian<br />

study data.<br />

Although studies in humans are lacking, (Grova et al., 2002) showed that BaP is<br />

poorly absorbed through the gut in goats when administered orally in vegetable<br />

oil. Radiolabeled BaP fed to these animals led to 88% recovery of the<br />

radioactivity in feces, indicating little BaP reached the bloodstream where it could<br />

be taken up in mother’s milk. In contrast, respiratory absorption of PAHs in<br />

particulate <strong>for</strong>m through smoking is about 75% efficient (Van Rooij et al., 1994).<br />

The following factors may have influenced the difference between oral Tco<br />

values and inhalation Tco values:<br />

• First-pass metabolism in the liver following oral intake be<strong>for</strong>e reaching the<br />

blood supply of the breast versus entering systemic blood circulation prior<br />

to passage through the liver with the inhalation route (however, some PAH<br />

metabolism occurs in the lung)<br />

• Gut assimilation of PAHs is likely to occur at a different rate than the rate<br />

of passage across the lung<br />

Looking at mother’s milk Tcos in terms of carryover rate suggests that<br />

accumulation of PAHs in the mother’s body occurs more readily when inhaled<br />

versus ingested. Carryover rate, defined here as the daily output of PAHs in<br />

mother’s milk (µg/day) over the daily intake of PAHs (µg/day), can be estimated<br />

by multiplying a PAH Tco by the daily output of mother’s milk. Since milk<br />

production in human mothers are about 1.0 kg/day, the calculated carryover rate<br />

turns out to be the same as the PAH Tco value. A carryover rate greater than<br />

one in PAH transfer suggests that accumulation occurs in the mother’s body prior<br />

to lactation.<br />

J-34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!