Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Version 2 February,June 2012 J.3.2 Oral Biotransfer of PAHs to Mother’s Milk Diet is the largest contributor by pathway to total PAH intake from ubiquitous background sources for the general public and other situations where airborne levels are not remarkably high (Lioy et al., 1988). In a risk assessment of a reference nonsmoking male, a mean total PAH intake of 3.12 µg/d was estimated of which dietary intake was 96.2%, air 1.6%, water 0.2% and soil 0.4% (Menzie et al., 1992; Ramesh et al., 2004). Inhalation, soil ingestion and homegrown produce pathways can be important when considering total dose from a single stationary source. PAHs contaminate homegrown produce and soil through direct deposition. Milk and meat from home-raised animals or commercial sources would be less of a contributor because many PAHs are highly metabolized by these animals following intake from contaminated pastures and soil. There are no studies available that relate PAH dietary intake directly to mother’s milk concentrations for these compounds, although studies of PAH dietary intake have been performed in several countries. Therefore, the PAH biotransfer efficiency to mother’s milk from food was calculated using PAH dietary intake data and mother’s milk PAH data from separate studies. OEHHA recognizes the uncertainty in this approach but it appears to be the best currently available. Table J.3-5 shows the daily dietary intake of carcinogenic PAHs from published studies of European residents. Regional preferences, ethnicity, and individual dietary preferences will influence the amount of PAHs ingested with food. In addition, there were differences among the intake studies in the number and type of PAHs investigated in foods. Even though dietary habits and PAH analysis methods can result in different levels of PAH intake, the total dietary intakes of PAHs in each of five studies in Table J.3-5 were generally within an order of magnitude of each other. J-28
Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Version 2 February,June 2012 Table J.3-5: Summary Estimates of PAHs with and without Cancer Potency Factors Dietary Intake (µg/day) PAH (no. of rings a ) Italian Lodovici et al (1995) Adults Dutch De Vos et al. (1990) c Adult males J-29 Spanish Marti- Cid et al. (2008) Adults Spanish Falco et al. (2003) Adults U.K. Dennis et al. (1983) Adults With Cancer Potency Factors AM b , SD AM* AM* AM, SD AM* Naphthalene (2) NA d NA 1.846 0.823, 0.056 NA Chrysene (4) 0.84, 0.0131 0.86 – 1.53 0.204 0.564, 0.037 0.5 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.2 – 0.36 0.139 0.310, 0.021 0.22 (4) 0.47, 0.0093 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.31 – 0.36 0.137 0.188, 0.014 0.18 (5) 0.17, 0.0101 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.1 – 0.14 0.086 0.094, 0.006 0.06 (5) 0.06, 0.0043 Benzo[a]pyrene (5) 0.13, 0.0003 0.12 – 0.29 0.083 0.113, 0.008 0.25 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracen NDd e (5) 0.01, 0.0026 e 0.084 0.048, 0.003 0.03 Indeno[1,2,3- 0.08 – 0.46 0.102 0.045, 0.003 ND c,d]pyrene (6) ND Without Cancer Potency Factors AM, SD AM* AM* AM, SD AM* Anthracene (3) NA 0.03 – 0.64 0.428 0.088, 0.006 NA Acenaphthylene (3) NA NA 0.354 0.402, 0.026 NA Phenanthrene (3) NA NA 3.568 2.062, 0.150 NA Fluorene (3) NA NA 0.934 0.206, 0.017 NA Acenaphthene (3) NA NA 0.368 0.071, 0.005 NA Pyrene (4) 0.19, 0.0043 NA 1.084 1.273, 0.092 1.09 Fluoranthene (4) 1.03, 0.0106 0.99 – 1.66 1.446 0.848, 0.062 0.99 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene (6) 0.20, 0.0009 0.2 – 0.36 0.112 0.214, 0.017 0.21 a no. of rings, number of rings are an indicator of lipophilicity (greater # of rings, more likely to partition to body fat); b Arithmetic mean (AM), Standard Deviation (SD); c The Dutch dietary intakes were presented as the range of lower bound values (calculated by taking values below the detection limit to be zero) to upper bound values (calculated by taking values below the detection limit to be equal to the limit) d NA, Not available; e ND, Not determined; * no measure of variance was reported (Dennis et al., 1983a; Dennis et al., 1983b; De Vos et al., 1990; Lodovici et al., 1995; Falcó et al., 2003; Martí-Cid et al., 2008) Mother’s milk PAH concentration data from nonsmoking rural lactating women living in Italy by Zaneiri et al. (2007) and Del Bubba et al. (2005) were pooled and paired with estimates of PAH dietary intake in the Italian population (Lodovici et al., 1995; Del Bubba et al., 2005; Zanieri et al., 2007). The mother’s milk PAH data are described above in the PAH inhalation biotransfer section. The study by
Page 1 and 2:
SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 20
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
SRPcientific Review Panel Draft Ver
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Scientific Review Panel Draft Febru
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256: SRP Review Draft Version 2 June, 20
Page 279 and 280: Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Ve
Page 305: Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Ve
show all

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?