26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scientific Review PanelSRP Draft Version 2 February,June 2012<br />

individual PAH was higher in mother’s milk of nonsmokers than in smokers. For<br />

example, in column two of Table J.3-4, mother’s milk benzo[b]fluoranthene,<br />

pyrene and anthracene have negative concentration values.<br />

These discrepancies could be due to the natural variation in the ability of<br />

individuals to transfer inhaled PAHs to milk, or as Zaneiri et al. suggested, a<br />

result of greater exposure to certain PAHs in some foods compared to cigarette<br />

smoke. The small sample sets (n=11 <strong>for</strong> each group of smokers and<br />

nonsmokers) in the Zanieri study are less likely to represent the true mean in the<br />

study population and magnify the large variation in this biological response.<br />

Additional uncertainties in the use of smokers to estimate PAH transfer<br />

coefficients include that fact that lung metabolism may be different in smokers<br />

because of the much higher doses of PAHs that smokers receive relative to<br />

those only exposed in ambient pollution. Cytochrome P-450 enzymes are known<br />

to be induced when exposure is greater and there<strong>for</strong>e metabolism could be<br />

proportionately greater in smokers. In addition, at higher dose levels some<br />

enzyme systems may become saturated which could alter the pattern of<br />

metabolism.<br />

However, smokers are the best population <strong>for</strong> estimating PAH Tcos because the<br />

inhalation dose can be separated from background inhalation and dietary<br />

exposure, and the inhalation dose from the cigarettes can be estimated. <strong>OEHHA</strong><br />

requested raw data from the investigators <strong>for</strong> individual women in the study, but<br />

un<strong>for</strong>tunately, only the summary statistics from the published paper were<br />

available to us.<br />

J-25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!