26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scientific Review Panel Draft February, 2012<br />

systemic absorption was estimated at 3.4% of the migrated dose. After skin<br />

washing, the residual fraction in skin at the site of dermal application was 13.8%<br />

of the migrated dose. Assuming the fraction of DEHP in skin will be eventually<br />

absorbed systemically, a maximum absorption rate of 0.24 µg/cm 2 /hr was<br />

calculated.<br />

Barber et al. (1992) carried out an in vitro DEHP dermal exposure study to<br />

compare rates of absorption through full thickness rat skin and human stratum<br />

corneum. DEHP was applied to skin samples in saline solution, and absorption<br />

expressed in terms of absorption rate after 32 hrs of exposure. Absorption<br />

through rat skin and human stratum corneum was 0.42 and 0.10 µg/cm 2 /hr,<br />

respectively, indicating that DEHP more rapidly penetrated rat skin than human<br />

stratum corneum by a factor of 4.2.<br />

Damage to the rat skin observed following exposure was implied as a possible<br />

reason <strong>for</strong> greater permeability of DEHP through rat skin. Scott et al. (1987) also<br />

compared absorption rates of DEHP through rat and human epidermal<br />

membranes (dermal layer removed), obtaining rates of 2.24 and 1.06 µg/cm 2 /hr<br />

<strong>for</strong> rat and human skin, respectively. DEHP was applied to the skin sample in<br />

50% v/v aqueous ethanol with exposure up to 53 hrs <strong>for</strong> rat skin and 72 hrs <strong>for</strong><br />

human skin. Damage to rat skin, but not human skin, was also observed by<br />

Scott et al. (1987) after exposure.<br />

B. Supporting Studies<br />

The National Toxicology Program investigated the dermal absorption of 14 Clabeled<br />

DEHP in male F344 rats (Melnick et al., 1987; Elsisi et al., 1989). The<br />

labeled compound was dissolved in ethanol and applied directly to the skin (30<br />

mg DEHP/kg body weight; n = 3 per time point) at a dose of 5-8 mg/cm 2 . The<br />

ethanol was then evaporated and the site of application was covered with a<br />

per<strong>for</strong>ated plastic cap. DEHP showed a very slow rate of excretion over five<br />

days, likely reflecting a slow dermal uptake process. After five days,<br />

approximately 86% of the applied dose was recovered from the skin at the site of<br />

application. However, it was not determined how much of the applied dose<br />

remained on the surface of the skin and how much was absorbed into the skin.<br />

Approximately 5% of the applied dose was recovered in urine and feces, while<br />

the amount of the label remaining in the body five days after dosing was less<br />

than 2% of the applied dose of DEHP.<br />

Ng et al. (1992) examined dermal absorption of DEHP both in vivo and vitro in<br />

hairless guinea pigs. In an in vivo study, radiolabeled DEHP dissolved in<br />

acetone (53 µg DEHP; 34 nmols/cm 2 ) was applied topically on a dorsal area of<br />

the animals which was then covered with a nonocclusive patch. After 24 hours,<br />

the patch was removed and the dosing site cleaned to remove any unabsorbed<br />

compound. Absorption (estimated from urine and feces) was monitored up to 7<br />

days post treatment. To account <strong>for</strong> incomplete excretion after the compound<br />

F-63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!