26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scientific Review Panel Draft February, 2012<br />

gastrointestinal fluids that then becomes available <strong>for</strong> absorption. By definition,<br />

bioaccessibility should exceed bioavailability.<br />

Published data <strong>for</strong> some chemicals considered in this section contain only data<br />

<strong>for</strong> neat application of the chemical to skin in solvent or aqueous vehicle.<br />

Generally, there is a lack of absorption data <strong>for</strong> chemicals bound to soil. To<br />

avoid potential overestimation of absorption in these instances, bioaccessibility<br />

and soil leaching studies of soil-bound chemicals are considered <strong>for</strong> adjusting the<br />

fractional absorption of the pure chemical applied to skin. These studies can be<br />

used to determine the extractable, or bioaccessible, fraction of a soil pollutant<br />

that can be deposited on the skin surface. Water added to soil is often used to<br />

determine the bioaccessibility of a soil-bound chemical, although human sweat or<br />

synthetic sweat has also been used to estimate the amount of a pollutant that<br />

can be leached from contaminated soils (Horowitz and Finley, 1993; Filon et al.,<br />

2006; Nico et al., 2006).<br />

F.2.3 Soil - Chemical - Tissue Interaction.<br />

Soil is a complex matrix with a highly variable composition and absorptive<br />

capacity. Organic content, mineral composition, particle size, and pH are all<br />

highly variable. Because the dermal absorption of a compound from soil is often<br />

dependent on these characteristics, it follows that transfer of a chemical from soil<br />

particles to the skin surface <strong>for</strong> absorption is likely to vary with soil type.<br />

Transfer of a chemical from soil particles to the skin surface is limited by the<br />

chemical’s diffusion rate (McKone, 1990). Diffusion through the soil phase,<br />

through the air, and through soil moisture is all possible. Fugacity-based<br />

interphase transport models were constructed to describe the rate of each of<br />

these processes <strong>for</strong> chemicals in soil particles and to predict the dermal uptake<br />

rates. It was shown that predicted dermal uptake of chemicals from soil depends<br />

on the Henry’s constant (vapor pressure/solubility in water), the octanol/water<br />

partition coefficient of a chemical, and the soil thickness on skin. If the Henry’s<br />

constant is very high, chemicals will be lost from soil particles (or the skin<br />

surface) quite rapidly, so net dermal uptake of chemicals added to soil will be<br />

low. If the Henry’s constant is very low, diffusion through the soil particle layer<br />

will be too slow to allow much dermal uptake unless the soil particles are very<br />

small. A high octanol/water partition coefficient is associated with tight binding to<br />

soil and low water solubility; these properties also limit the ability of a chemical to<br />

diffuse through the mixed lipid/water phases of the stratum corneum.<br />

Other mathematical models have been developed by Bunge and Parks (1997) to<br />

describe dermal absorption of organic chemicals provided the chemical fits<br />

certain assumptions, such as falling within a defined octanol/water partition<br />

coefficient range (1.59 ≤ log10Kow ≤ 5.53), and that the molecular weight of the<br />

organic chemical is ≤ 700. Soil constraints <strong>for</strong> the model include contaminated<br />

soils with about 0.2% organic carbon or more, and with a clay fraction less than<br />

F-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!