26.03.2013 Views

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

Appendix D Food Codes for NHANES - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scientific Review Panel Draft February, 2012<br />

conditions. For example, the ABS will decrease as an organic chemical is<br />

increasingly loaded onto skin. In other words, absorption of an organic chemical<br />

through skin is flux-limited, and loading more chemical onto skin in a defined<br />

area will not increase flux, but will decrease the ABS value.<br />

To aid interpretation of dermal absorption-related phenomena, Kissel (2011)<br />

proposed a dimensionless variate representing the ratio of mass delivery to<br />

plausible absorptive flux under experimental or environmental conditions. High<br />

values of this dimensionless dermal variate connote surplus supply (ie., fluxlimited)<br />

conditions. This situation is similar to loading skin with chemical-bound<br />

soil above monolayer levels. The potential mismeasure of dermal absorption<br />

with chemicals applied neat to skin is addressed below <strong>for</strong> every chemical in<br />

which an ABS is derived in this way.<br />

F.2.7 In Vivo Vs. In Vitro Experiments<br />

It is generally recognized that the most reliable method <strong>for</strong> assessing skin<br />

absorption of a chemical is to measure penetration in vivo using the appropriate<br />

animal model or human volunteers (Kao, 1990). Thus, in vivo data are preferred<br />

over in vitro data <strong>for</strong> determination of a chemical ABS in this exposure<br />

assessment. In vivo data may be lacking <strong>for</strong> some chemicals of interest in this<br />

document due to economical considerations <strong>for</strong> conducting tests in humans and<br />

other mammalian species, or due to ethical concerns <strong>for</strong> testing in humans.<br />

In vitro studies have the benefit of measuring dermal absorption under more<br />

easily controlled environments. Human skin can be tested without the inherent<br />

risks of a clinical study, and absorption through skin and retention in skin can be<br />

directly measured. Consequently, in vitro dermal absorption studies are<br />

frequently per<strong>for</strong>med and provide the basis <strong>for</strong> an ABS <strong>for</strong> some chemicals<br />

presented in this section, following careful consideration <strong>for</strong> relevance to in vivo<br />

human exposure.<br />

Although good agreement has been found when comparing in vivo and in vitro<br />

absorption results <strong>for</strong> some chemicals, trends towards lower absorption with in<br />

vitro exposure have been observed. For example, lipophilic compounds<br />

frequently have limited solubility in the buffered aqueous receptor fluids often<br />

used <strong>for</strong> in vitro cell systems, impeding the flow into the receptor fluid and<br />

resulting in an underestimation of skin penetration (Wester and Maibach, 1999).<br />

In vivo, lipophilic compounds penetrate the stratum corneum and diffuse through<br />

skin and, because of the solubilizing and emulsifying abilities of biological fluid,<br />

may readily be taken away by the blood in the dermal vasculature.<br />

A reduction in skin viability of excised skin samples may occur due to storage<br />

conditions prior to use and may affect dermal absorption measurements. For<br />

example, the metabolic properties of human skin are reduced if the skin samples<br />

were previously frozen. Some polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAHs) undergo<br />

F-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!