06.04.2013 Views

Download Ebook - The Knowledge Den

Download Ebook - The Knowledge Den

Download Ebook - The Knowledge Den

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE VERB 127<br />

ily derived by adding the personal pronouns to the verbal root, kasad,<br />

'to conquer', kasdak, 'I conqueror' : here the inflection of the first person<br />

is clearly connected with tbe independent formof the personal prono un<br />

ant1ku, 'I'. <strong>The</strong> connection between the verbal root and the pronominal<br />

suffix is one of apposition and not of possession. <strong>The</strong> suffixed con­<br />

jugation would be illustrated best by the phrase 'man - go - he',<br />

'man - going - he " , man - he goes " i. e., 'the man goes '.<br />

Likewise in Sumerian we have a suffixed conjugation ; althoügh in<br />

the evolution oí the language this conjugation appears almost<br />

exclusively in dependent pbrases. yet it must have existed side by side<br />

witb the more important prefixed conjugation from the beginning. zig­<br />

zig-zu, 'tbou ragest'" elearly stand s for the root zig and the inde­<br />

pendent pronoun of the second person singular. Other examples are: ­<br />

a nu-nag-a-Tiw, 'water I drink: not"; enem/ila-ni an-sú an ni, dúb­<br />

ba-ni, 'at his ,vord on higb heaven trembles of itself' 3; za-e {ju-de-a-bi,<br />

, they cry to thee ' '.<br />

§'183. Although traces oí this primitive suffixed conjugation in<br />

independent sentences may be noted at all stages oí the language, yet<br />

tbe construction appears more often in dependent phrases. Without<br />

reflection we would presume that the suffixed dependent conjugation is<br />

identical in its inherent force with the independent conjugation, and that<br />

the reservation of the construction for dependent phrases, is apure<br />

convention '. <strong>The</strong> distinction is, however, based upon a difference of<br />

relation between the verbal root and the suffix. In the independent<br />

construction the pronoun represents the subject as an appositional idea.<br />

It is suffixed to the verb solely to indicate the close relation between the<br />

subject and the verb. In the dependent construction we have to deal<br />

with the possessive suffix, and the verbal root is treated as a nOUl1pos-<br />

1. Guc1. ey!. A 8, 23.<br />

2. SBP. 320, 5.<br />

3. SBR. 9,87.<br />

4. ASKT. 115, 13.<br />

5. So 1 expressed myself in the introduction to my Syntaxe.<br />

Seconc1ary<br />

suflixec1<br />

conjugation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!