17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results<br />

- 119 -<br />

Figure *l shows the signals diffracted from opposite edges of a circular seatterer.<br />

Constructive interference of the sound wavelets can be seen lying<br />

between the two signals. Figures 5-10 show the frequency spectrum of sound<br />

waves diffracted from the 7 mm brass rod at different orientations. Plotting<br />

fn vs n, the slope yields if as illustrated in Figs. 11 and 12. A frequency<br />

analysis plot and a time analysis plot yielding d and y are shown in<br />

Figs. 13 and It. The actual diameters of the brass rod were measured with a<br />

pair of vernier calipers to ± .02 mm. The values are compared in Table 1.<br />

The axes of the brass rods were vertical (i.e., y = 0) in all cases because<br />

no mechanical system providing accurate control of y was available at the<br />

time of experimentation, but there was no loss of generality in the method<br />

presented here as experimentally, the transducer sees only the relative orientation<br />

of the circular rod with respect to itself.<br />

Figure 15 compares the diameters deduced from frequency analysis and time analysis<br />

with those measured from the vernier calipers. Figure 16 compares y<br />

deduced from frequency analysis and time analysis with the known y. The<br />

average of the error is ~1°. Table 2 illustrates that Ataf~l. The 5.02 mm<br />

diam brass rod was taken as an example.<br />

C<strong>ON</strong>CLUSI<strong>ON</strong>S AND DISCUSSI<strong>ON</strong>S<br />

The time-of-flight method and ultrasonic frequency analysis have been used to<br />

measure the diameters and orientation of circular rods. Commercially available<br />

equipment has been used. In the present experiment, both methods yield<br />

the same information. However it is possible that in other cases, the two<br />

methods can yield information which complement each other. It should be noted<br />

that time measurement can be deduced from the rectified rf signal (Fig. 17).<br />

When the signal is rectified, a lot of information is lost. For unrectified<br />

rf signals frequency analysis can be used to find the bulk and surface properties<br />

of the flaws.<br />

Time and frequency are mutually complementary variables. The two parameters<br />

can reinforce and supplement each other in terms of information each one produces.<br />

The properties of a physical system can be described in terms of pairs<br />

of mutually complementary variables or properties. Other examples of complementary<br />

aspects are the position and linear momentum of a particle, the angular<br />

orientation of a system and its angular momentum, and so on.<br />

The time-of-flight method and ultrasonic frequency analysis have become important<br />

research tools in characterizing flaws for the last ten years. The merger<br />

of the two methods will become a powerful tool for nondestructive testing<br />

in the next twenty years. And hopefully, Canada will play an important role<br />

in their marriage.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

The author thanks Mr. M. Hafer for help with plotting the graphs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!