17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 80 -<br />

an additional reverse magnet to the pipe bar magnet to give the magnetic<br />

profiles shown in Figure 3.<br />

These figures show that stress in ferromagnetic structures can produce significant<br />

but complex magnetic effects. : now review the basic results of the<br />

effects of uniform stress on simple sarii£-\es of ferromagnetic material such as<br />

line pipe steel.<br />

Effects of Constant Stress<br />

Figure 4 shows hysteresis loops for simple samples of line pipe steel under<br />

constant tension or compression. The effect of stress is to give a slight<br />

tilt to the hysteresis loops. At low field tension tends to increase the<br />

magnetisation, compression to decrease it although both tend to decrease it<br />

at high field. At first this seems to be explicable by applying Le Chatelier"s<br />

principle (which states that the application of a constraint to a system in<br />

equilibrium tends to shift the position of equilibrium to reduce the applied<br />

constraint) to the magnetostrictive effect (the change in length on magnetisation)<br />

. Figure 5 shows typical magnetostrictive behaviour for iron. The<br />

magnetostrictive coefficient (strain) is dependent on both field and applied<br />

stress. A positive magnetostrictive coefficient i.e. expansion on magnetisation,<br />

would suggest that tensile strain would cause an increase in<br />

magnetisation in order to reduce the applied stress and this seems to be in<br />

good accord with Figure 4. unfortunately the results of changing the stress<br />

in a constant field are more complex.<br />

Effects of Changing Stress in a Constant Field<br />

Figure 6 shows the changes in magnetisation occur ing from the same initial<br />

conditic.is during a tension cycle and a compression cycle under constant<br />

applied field. Both of these cycles result in increased magnetisation and<br />

are therefore contrary to predictions based on Le Chateliei's principle.<br />

Figure 7 shows the changes in magnetisation occuring as a result of similar<br />

stress cycles applied at different fields around a hysteresis loop. The<br />

results depend on the initial conditions and are due to a reduction in the<br />

magnatic hysteresis.<br />

Magnetic hysteresis occurs because magnetic domains are not free to move to<br />

their equilibrium magnetisated but are pinned (2). The effect of stress is<br />

to reduce this domain pinning and to let the magnetisation approach the true<br />

equilibrium (anhysteretic) value. The dotted line in Figure 7 shows the<br />

anhysteretic magnetisation curve, explained in Figure 8. The stress induced<br />

shift towards the anhysteretic magnetisation is further exemplified in<br />

Figure 9 which shows the changes in magnetisation induced by similar stress<br />

cycles. For cycles originating at points on the initial magnetisation curve<br />

the changes appear to be related to .he differences between the initial and<br />

anhysteretic magnetisation curves and this is confirmed by the very small<br />

changes resulting from cycles originating on the anhysteretic curve itself.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!