17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 264 -<br />

Metal components with classical acoustic emission sources (eg, propagating<br />

crack) exhibit the Kaiser effect. This effect describes the phenomenon whereby<br />

acoustic emission will only be generated when stress exceeds the previous highest<br />

value. A new component will tend to yield copious acoustic emission when<br />

first loaded. If the load were removed and reapplied, no acoustic emission<br />

would result until the load was further increased above its previous value.<br />

This can be beneficial in that if a structure is loaded to the onset of acoustic<br />

emission, an indication of load history is gained. If a periodic proof load is<br />

imposed, such as 150% working load, acoustic emission will only be generated if<br />

active degradation has occurred since the last proof load.<br />

The Kaiser effect is less well exhibited by frp composites. This is because the<br />

resin material flows and thus relaxation occurs on load removal. This was<br />

demonstrated in the laboratory, Figure 5. Here an frp specimen was subjected to<br />

a three point bend test such that acoustic emission occurred. The load was then<br />

removed. When it was reapplied with little delay, almost no acoustic emission<br />

was generated, in accordance with the Kaiser effect. However, if a delay of<br />

24 h ensued prior to reloading, much of the acoustic emission was recovered.<br />

This phenomenon has implications where a test is performed following an accident<br />

to a boom, such as a known overload.<br />

Some reference has been made in the literature to the ultimate strength of frp<br />

components with respect to acoustic emission monitoring. The ultimate tensile<br />

strength is truly the load that just fails to initiate the avalanche failure<br />

mechanism. Whilst loads much higher than this can be sustained for finite<br />

periods of time, they do impart damage and do reduce the load level required to<br />

initiate avalanche failure. Also, as failure is a time dependent phenomenon,<br />

above the threshold load acoustic emission will continue to be generated up to<br />

ultimate failure. Initially this may be very sparse but becoming more prolific<br />

as fracture approaches.<br />

For loads below the avalanche threshold, the Kaiser effect (short-term) tends to<br />

hold. For loads above the threshold, acoustic emission will always occur. If a<br />

boom is loaded, unloaded and then reloaded and acoustic emissions recur, then<br />

the threshold load has been reached. In this case, damage will have been done<br />

and acoustic emission will be re-established at a slighly lower load dependent<br />

on the degree of degradation. The ratio of these two loads is known as the<br />

"Felicity Ratio" and is used as a measure of damage.<br />

PERFORMANCE OF THE ACOUSTIC EMISSI<strong>ON</strong> TEST<br />

With the boom in the lowered state, but with outriggers operating, sensors are<br />

attached. It is important that the sensors are well coupled to the component.<br />

This is as simple as having a clean surface, using a small amount of viscous<br />

fluid such as vacuum grease between sensor and the surface and holding the<br />

sensor firmly in position. Sensor hold-downs are extremely varied and may range<br />

;rora a magnetic clamp for steel components to a simple band of adhesive tape<br />

for the boom Figure 6. Some care must be taken to ensure that the hold-down is<br />

not going to move, and hence produce its own acoustic emissions, during the<br />

test.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!