17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 350 -<br />

5. ADVANTAGES OF USING THE FIRST ORDER FORM<br />

An important advantage of the first order form is that the most common boundary<br />

conditions can be expressed without involving space derivatives of the solution<br />

components. This makes numerical approximation at the boundaries much easier.<br />

For example, the free surface (stress free) boundary condition involves only<br />

two linear combinations of the three stresses. More general conditions on the<br />

normal and tangential stress and displacement are equally easy to apply.<br />

In general, the space domains of interest include a wide variety of shapes that<br />

do not lend themselves to modelling on a Cartesian grid. Many cases are suited<br />

to a polar coordinate system or require the use of a non-uniform grid. It is<br />

generally much more difficult to modify the second order form of the equations<br />

to use non-rectangular grids than it is to modify the first order form. The<br />

modelling of inhomogeneous materials is also easier when the first order form<br />

is used, and the modified set of equations which results is similar to the<br />

modified equation set for a non-uniform grid. In both cases, the advantage of<br />

using the first order form is due simply to the ease of manipulation of lower<br />

order space derivatives.<br />

Little is known about the properties of numerical approximations to the second<br />

order form of the equations, but approximations of first order hyperbolic PDE's<br />

have been investigated in great detail. The stability of difference<br />

approximations to initial-boundary value problems, such as we are discussing,<br />

is not easy to guarantee; results are given in [9] and [10] for the first order<br />

equations. The stability of approximations to the second order form of the<br />

Elastic Wave Equation has only been investigated experimentally and should not<br />

be assumed to hold in all cases.<br />

6. LIMITING THE COMPUTATI<strong>ON</strong>AL AREA<br />

In most cases, it is not necessary to model the whole object being tested. One<br />

can safely ignore the parts that cannot contribute to the response signal at<br />

the transducer during the time period of interest. When modelling the testing<br />

of weld joints in pipelines, for instance, there is no need to consider more<br />

than the small region that includes the transducer and weld. Any signal<br />

spilling out of this region is effectively lost down the pipeline.<br />

To limit the extent of the computational region, an artificial boundary is used<br />

to truncate the object and absorb the energy of any disturbance reaching it.<br />

Ideally, there should be no reflected disturbance at this boundary, and waves<br />

should appear to pass through it undistorted. It is possible to impose<br />

perfectly absorbing boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems in one<br />

dimension, but it is usually impossible to do so for multi-dimensional<br />

problems. A study of absorbing boundary conditions for wave equations can be<br />

found in Clayton and Enquist [11].<br />

The simplest absorbing boundary conditions have been used in our numerical<br />

model. They are designed to absorb waves travelling perpendicularly to the<br />

boundary perfectly, but have proved to be most satisfactory for waves of all<br />

orientations tried so far. In fact, the energy reflected by this artificial<br />

boundary usually amounts to only a few percent of the energy reaching it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!