17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 55 -<br />

by the detector, the detected signal in the case of the heterodyne probe can<br />

be written (the speckles add up incoherently) (18):<br />

l D = sß Isp cos f 2irf ßt + (?i -t2).t(t) + * (t)] (3)<br />

where fjj is the shifting frequency kj and k2 are the wavevectors of the 2<br />

beams, (ki - k2>.ô = 4n sin 6 (sin a 6x + cos a 6z)/A, a being the angle<br />

between k^ - k2 and the normal to the surface, ôx and Sz being respectively<br />

the in-plane and out-of-plane displacements. As seen above, this expression<br />

gives a carrier signal at fß and two sidebands, which enables easy<br />

calibration. In-plane and out-of-plane displacements can be detected, but<br />

this probe is particularly useful to detect displacements parallel to the<br />

surface (in this case ki-&2 is perpendicular to the surface and a = TT/2).<br />

When both sidebands are detected, it can be shown that the signal-to-noise<br />

ratio is given by (it is indépendant of the number of speckles):<br />

is/iN = (?i -k2).t \/n Isp/(2 B h v) (4)<br />

Eq. 4 also shows that, in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio,<br />

ISpShould be maximized, which means that the speckle size should be of the<br />

order of the detection aperture and consequently that this aperture should be<br />

large enough to collect a large part of the scattered light. This means, in<br />

turn, very sharp focusing. When typical numerical values are used, a<br />

detection limit of the same order as the one found before is obtained.<br />

Therefore, this probe has the same drawback as the one described in the<br />

previous section. Furthermore, it tends to be more bulky since 0 cannot be<br />

too small for a reasonable detection limit.<br />

IV THE MICHELS<strong>ON</strong> VELOCITY INTERFEROMETER<br />

A typical setup is sketched in fig. 4. We will note the main difference<br />

between this setup and the one of fig. 2: here the interferometer does not<br />

make use of the surface as a mirror, but views the light scattered by it.<br />

This type of system has been used in shock wave research (25) and has been<br />

also considered for the detection of ultrasound (26). The detected intensity<br />

for a given direction 6 of an incident ray is:<br />

ID = Ai + A2 cos (2TT V/AV + $) (5)<br />

where A, B and are constant, the free spectral range Av = 1/T =c/2Ad(8),<br />

(T is the delay time, Ad(8) is the difference of arms lengths for the incident<br />

ray inclined by 6. As sketched in the boxed diagram of fig. 4, which plots<br />

the spectral response given by eq. 5, frequency discrimination is obtained<br />

when the laser frequency (a single frequency laser source is necessary) is<br />

tuned to a zero crossing 2ir v/Av + = +_ IT/2 + 2mir, m being an integer). The<br />

surface being rough and irregular acts as an incoherent source, so the fringes<br />

are only observed at infinity (24) or at the focus of a lens. It can be<br />

readily shown that Ad(6) = Ad cos 6, where Ad is the path difference for the<br />

ray perpendicular to the mirrors. The fringes are then concentric rings, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!