17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 168 -<br />

MAKING THE TRANSITI<strong>ON</strong> TO AUTOMATIC PROCESSING IN RADIOGRAPHIC NDT<br />

W.E.J. UcKinnzij<br />

E.I. Va Vont Ve. Ue.moan.is ê Co., Inc.<br />

Wilmington, Ve.la.waie.<br />

U.S.A.<br />

MAKING THE TRANSITI<strong>ON</strong> TO AUTOMATIC PROCESSING IN RADIOGRAPHIC NDT<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Automatic processing offers the potential for high volume, consistent quality<br />

radiographie visible image formation. But, it is only partially automatic<br />

and careful planning and execution are required to achieve the inherent<br />

value. This paper discusses the advantages, and problems of automatic<br />

processing and the procedures necessary in making the transition fran manual<br />

to automatic processing.<br />

INTRODUCTI<strong>ON</strong><br />

Radiographie latent image processing, whether manual or automatic, by hand or<br />

by a machine, is a chemical reaction wherein the latent image is amplified<br />

into the useful visible image. This is an oxidation/reduction reaction. The<br />

developer is oxidized, releasing electrons which selectively attack exposed<br />

silver halide crystals and reduces them to black metallic silver. This<br />

reaction must be controlled by elements of time, temperature, and activity.<br />

A radiographer chooses appropriate time, temperature, and activity levels.<br />

In manual processing a person controls these values. In an automatic processor<br />

the processor controls these functions. To many, this appears to be a<br />

loss of control. Actually, by eliminating the human variable there is<br />

increased consisfency and productivity. But, what if the technique is<br />

incorrect? In manual it can be salvagedi This observation is a classic<br />

dicotomy because yes the film can be saved, but should it be since obviously<br />

the wrong technique was used. Allowing that processing, whether manual or<br />

automatic, must neither overdevelop or underdevelop, why would it be manipulated<br />

to save a poor technique? The answer is, in order to save an exposure<br />

and this is referred to as "sight development". Its major failing is that,<br />

it provides a way to mask the need for technique reform or control.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!