17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 212 -<br />

The eddy current and wall thickness probes are located at the same rotational<br />

position on the inspection head, however they could not be used simultaneously<br />

during an axial scan due to the conflicting requirements of the two systems<br />

(the eddy current scan must be continuous whereas the ultrasonic probe must be<br />

stopped for each measurement). This separation of the data collection scans<br />

caused some problems on numerous occasions as the inspection drive mechanism<br />

would tend to slip rotationally and corkscrew without affecting the rotational<br />

display counter. This had serious consequences for the gap system since a<br />

small rotation in a typical pressure tube during an axial scan would result<br />

in a sharp rotational wall thickness change being sensed as a gradual axial<br />

change when in fact there was none. Such a situation, especially if only<br />

experienced during the eddy current or wall thickness scan, would result in<br />

misleading gap results.<br />

4.4 Sample Results<br />

The axial gap profile of a fuel channel exhibiting accelerated pressure tube<br />

sag due to the shift of a garter spring from its design location is shown in<br />

Figure 10. The gap system was originally conceived to discover situations<br />

such as this where the PT/CT spacing is very small in some areas.<br />

4.5 Sources of Errors<br />

Errors can generally be grouped into two categories, those that affect the<br />

accuracy of the measurements and those that affect the reliability of the<br />

system. The latter group tend to severely distort the data and would include<br />

such conditions as; cabling problems, misalignment of the wall thickness and<br />

eddy current probes, operator or analyst error and excessive temperature or<br />

resistivity changes. Many times these problems will cause the data or results<br />

to be unusual or even unreasonable when compared to historical data and known<br />

characteristics. Some checks that can be made to give credibility to the data<br />

are listed here:<br />

1. The eddy current signal trace should be smooth with no<br />

abrupt discontinuities or excessive noise or wandering.<br />

2. The wall thickness data is usually fairly constant in an<br />

axial direction.<br />

3. Some sign of both gap and wall thickness changes should<br />

be seen in the eddy current signal trace since it is<br />

highly unlikely that gap and wall thickness would vary in<br />

exactly opposing manners so as to cause the eddy current<br />

signal to remain constant.<br />

4. The gap profile should be fairly smooth.<br />

5. The gap near the rolled joints at both ends of an axial<br />

scan should be 8 mm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!