17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The fourth lesson learned was that there is a practical limit to an inspector's<br />

ability to interpret indications and that there should be no "loss of face"<br />

involved in requesting a tube to be removed to diagnose an unusual indication.<br />

As a demonstration that an inspector can be tempted to extrapolate theoretical<br />

experience too fer, we give the following example:<br />

At another plant in the examination of a conaenser tube which had been in<br />

service for many years, our inspector attributed a particular type of signal to<br />

a "magnetic" corrosion film which he felt must be on the inner surface of the<br />

tube (Figure 3). He was even able to demonstrate how this signal could be<br />

generated by magnetic tape wrapped around the inside of the tube (Figure 4).<br />

the signal was of completely the wrong phase angle to be interpreted as either<br />

an internal or an external defect. Metallographie examination of a tube pulled<br />

from the condenser a year later, failed to reveal this "magnetic film". It<br />

did, however reveal numerous corrosion pits on the internal tube surface<br />

(Figure 5). It was then demonstrated that the combined effect of closely<br />

spaced pits could rotate the angle of the resultant signal to such a degree<br />

that it would be unrecognizable as a partial through-wall defect. Five years<br />

ago when this incident occurred, the effect of multiple defects was not<br />

reported in the literature. Some research is now being carried out to<br />

elucidate these effects.<br />

The fifth and final lesson learned was that certain problems were beyond the<br />

capability of conventional eddy current techniques and that research laboratory<br />

back-up was essential.<br />

As a last illustration, I would like to talk about the detection of<br />

circumferential cracks in titanium condenser tubes at Pt. Lepreau G.S. All<br />

eddy current inspectors know that conventional bobbin probes used for tube<br />

inspections are very insensitive to circumferential cracks. When it was<br />

discovered that flow induced vibration had caused fatigue failure of some outer<br />

condenser tubes at Pt. Lepreau, we were faced with the problem of identifying<br />

within a few hours, a sufficiently sensitive method to detect other cracked<br />

tubes before they became major leakers. The solution was a new technique<br />

called "3D"*.<br />

This novel technique is so called because of its ability to add another<br />

dimension to eddy current testing — in addition to defect depth and volume,<br />

this equipment can also be used to determine its anqular position in the tube<br />

Wäll.<br />

A "3D" eddy current instrument is similar to a conventional eddy current<br />

instrument except that the 3D generates a three phase sine wave source. The<br />

special 3D probe is tx three coil probe connected in a three phase star<br />

configuration.<br />

* Developed and manufactured by Eddy Current Technology.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!