17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 296 -<br />

The graduates of these programs, along with the growing numbers of<br />

Level III NDT technicians, will help to fill the gap. However,<br />

engineers must also be educated in NDT technology. I recently had<br />

the pleasure of hearing Dr. David W. Hoeppner, of the University<br />

of Toronto speak on "Failure Analysis and NDT Interface". Dr.<br />

Hoeppner, an educator at the university level, is appalled at the<br />

lack of a solid component of nondestructive testing techniques in<br />

the education of our engineers.<br />

What will be the outcome of an even greater emphasis on nondestructive<br />

testing education in Canada? The saving of human lives, an<br />

increased prevention of human injury, higher productivity and the<br />

saving of billions of dollars.<br />

In the United States, the National Bureau of Standards and Battelle<br />

Columbus Laboratories conducted a study to assess the costs of<br />

material fracture to the United States for the year 1978. In their<br />

report'-, it states<br />

"The costs were large. In 1982 dollars the total cost was<br />

estimated to be $119 billion per year, about 4 percent of<br />

the gross national product. An estimated $35 billion per<br />

year could be saved through the use of currently available<br />

technology. Costs could be further reduced by as much as<br />

$28 billion per year through fracture-related research...<br />

The study concluded that substantial material, transportation,<br />

and capital investment costs could be saved if technology<br />

transfer, combined with research and development,<br />

succeeded in reducing the factors of uncertainty related to<br />

structural design. Equally safe or safer structures could<br />

be produced with substantial cost savings in material,<br />

transportation, and capital investment. This could be done<br />

by reducing the uncertainty currently related to structural<br />

design through better predictions of structural performance<br />

from materials properties, better process and quality control<br />

and in-service flaw monitoring, and less materials<br />

variability."<br />

The same solutions and cost savings, albeit with a lower dollar<br />

figure, apply to Canadian industry and, what dollar figure do we<br />

apply to the value of human life.<br />

The Economic Effects of Fracture in the United States<br />

Special Publication 647-1<br />

U.S. Department of Commerce - National Bureau of Standards<br />

R.P. Reed, J.H. Smith, B.W. Christ<br />

Issued March 1983

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!