17.06.2013 Views

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

FIFTH CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON NONDESTRUCTIVE ... - IAEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

d (mm)<br />

Y (deg)<br />

d (mm)<br />

Y (deg)<br />

d (mm)<br />

Y (deg)<br />

d (mm)<br />

Y (deg)<br />

d (mm)<br />

Y (deg)<br />

d (mm)<br />

Y (deg)<br />

- 121 -<br />

Table 1 - Comparison of diameters and orientations of the brass rods<br />

measured from frequency and time analysis with the caliper<br />

values. All brass rods were held vertically<br />

Caliper<br />

values<br />

2.02<br />

0.0<br />

2.96<br />

0.0<br />

4.02<br />

0.0<br />

5.02<br />

0.0<br />

6.01<br />

0.0<br />

7.00<br />

0.0<br />

Frequency<br />

analysis<br />

1.78<br />

2.2<br />

2.99<br />

-0.3<br />

3.81<br />

0.8<br />

4.76<br />

0.4<br />

4.93<br />

2.7<br />

5.99<br />

2.1<br />

% error<br />

-12.1<br />

1.1<br />

-5.3<br />

-5.2<br />

-18.0<br />

-14.5<br />

Time<br />

analysis<br />

2.20<br />

-1.5<br />

2.92<br />

0.3<br />

3.94<br />

0.8<br />

4.27<br />

3.2<br />

5.93<br />

0.1<br />

6.77<br />

0.9<br />

Table 2 - The table shows that AtAf~l for all orientations<br />

The 5.02 mm diam brass rod was taken as an example<br />

8 (deg)<br />

6.4<br />

12.7<br />

18.9<br />

25.1<br />

31.1<br />

at (us)<br />

0.82<br />

1.60<br />

2.20<br />

2.80<br />

3.20<br />

if (MHz)<br />

1.29<br />

0.69<br />

0.47<br />

0.36<br />

0.30<br />

AtAf<br />

1.06<br />

1.11<br />

1.04<br />

1.00<br />

0.96<br />

% error<br />

8.7<br />

-1.4<br />

-2.1<br />

-15.0<br />

-1.4<br />

-3.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!