29.06.2013 Views

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Determination of optimal applications of municipal biosolids to soils to<br />

optimize nutrient availability and minimize loss in surface runoff<br />

J. Lucid a , O. Fenton b , and M.G. Healy a*<br />

a Civil Engineering, National University of Ireland, <strong>Galway</strong>, Rep. Of Ireland.<br />

b Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Environmental Research Centre, Co. Wexford, Rep. Of Ireland.<br />

Email: mark.healy@nuigalway.ie<br />

Abstract<br />

Biosolids are the by-product of urban wastewater<br />

treatment and may be used as a fertiliser in agriculture.<br />

While Ireland can be seen as one of the leading<br />

countries in Europe in terms of landspreading of<br />

biosolids, very little is known of the phosphorus (P)<br />

availability of the biosolids to the soil or the potential<br />

for nutrient release in surface runoff following rainfall.<br />

The use of a novel agitator test in which an intact soil<br />

sample is placed in a glass beaker, overlain with a<br />

known volume of water and agitated to simulate<br />

overland flow, can be used to determine the release of P<br />

to surface runoff.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In Ireland there are approximately 86,000 tonnes of<br />

biosolids produced per year, of which over 70% is<br />

presently disposed off via landspreading. Provided that<br />

the biosolids are treated to the approved standards, they<br />

can be landspread in agriculture, and offer an excellent<br />

source of phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), and metals<br />

required for crop growth.<br />

The Landfill Directive, 1999/31/EC (EC, 1999),<br />

requires that, by 2014, the disposal of biodegradable<br />

municipal waste via landfill is to be reduced to 35% of<br />

the 1995 value. As a direct result, landspreading of<br />

biosolids provides a sustainable and beneficial<br />

alternative to landfilling.<br />

Guidelines governing their use are based on research<br />

carried out abroad and little information is based on<br />

their interaction with Irish soils. In addition, the<br />

guidelines do not consider the relationship between<br />

biosolids application rates, nutrient availability, and<br />

surface runoff of nutrients, suspended sediment (SS)<br />

and metals.<br />

2. Materials and Methods<br />

The soil used in this study was collected from a local<br />

farm in Co. <strong>Galway</strong>. Biosolids were collected from<br />

three wastewater treatment plants in Ireland. They were:<br />

lime stabilised biosolids, anaerobically digested (AD)<br />

biosolids, and centrifuged biosolids. They were tested<br />

for their nutrient and metal content.<br />

The following treatments were carried out in<br />

triplicate (n=3) in the agitator test: grassland only;<br />

grassland receiving centrifuged, lime stabilised and<br />

anaerobically-digested biosolids. All treatments were<br />

107<br />

applied at the optimum application rate for the soil<br />

under investigation.<br />

The soil, 40 to 50 mm in depth, was first transferred<br />

from aluminium cores to glass Pyrex cylinders. The<br />

biosolids were then applied to the soil surface (t=0hr)<br />

and left sit for a period of 24 hr to allow the treatments<br />

to interact with the soil. After this 24 hr period, the<br />

samples were then saturated by the gradual addition of<br />

deionised water over a 24-hr period. This was<br />

conducted until slight ponding of the water was seen on<br />

the surface of the soil. After this 48-hr period, 500 ml of<br />

deionised water was gently added to the beakers. An<br />

agitator paddle was then lowered to mid-depth in the<br />

overlying water and rotated at 20 rpm for 30 hrs as an<br />

attempt to simulate overland flow.<br />

Throughout the 30-hr period of the test, 2.5 ml water<br />

samples was removed at mid-depth of the overlying<br />

water at pre-determined time intervals and tested for<br />

dissolved reactive P (DRP). A 15 ml sample was<br />

removed from each beaker at the end of the test (at 30<br />

hr) and stored until metal analysis was carried out.<br />

3. Results<br />

Initial testing has shown that the centrifuged<br />

biosolids released, at their peak, 2.43 mg DRP L -1 ,<br />

which equated to a mass of P released in the overlying<br />

water of 148.464 mg m -2 of grassed surface area, while<br />

the AD biosolids released 0.36 mg DRP L -1 (22.2 mg m -<br />

2 ). The control results were far more conservative,<br />

releasing 0.14 mg DRP L -1 (8.86 mg m -2 ).<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

For all types of biosolids analysed, P levels in the<br />

overlying water are in excess of the maximum<br />

allowable P concentration in surface water (20 <strong>–</strong> 30 µg<br />

P L -1 ). Furthermore, owing to the centrifuged biosolids<br />

releasing eight times as much P as AD biosolids,<br />

biosolids may potentially need to be mixed with a<br />

chemical amendment capable to adsorbing P (alum,<br />

ferric chloride, etc.) before being landspread.<br />

5. References<br />

[1] Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the<br />

landfill of waste.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!