NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Cost-Effective Sustainable Construction Technology.<br />
Declan Gavigan 1 & Jamie Goggins 2<br />
National University of Ireland, <strong>Galway</strong>, Ireland.<br />
1) D.Gavigan1@nuigalway.ie, 2) Jamie.Goggins@nuigalway.ie<br />
Abstract<br />
Through this research project, the development of a<br />
novel cost-effective sustainable composite building<br />
technology or product for use in a European context<br />
will be proven through extensive testing in terms of<br />
durability, strength and appearance. In particular,<br />
composite materials comprising of locally sourced<br />
materials that have low impact on the environment are<br />
being developed. One construction technology used in<br />
developing countries that has very low impact on the<br />
environment is stabilised soil blocks (SSBs). The blocks<br />
are low-cost as their main component, the soil, is<br />
sourced locally, often directly from the site of<br />
construction and the main stabiliser used in their<br />
manufacture is cement. Further, these blocks can be<br />
produced on site, saving in transportation costs.<br />
This research project is separated into two phases;<br />
the first phase investigates alternative binders and<br />
stabilisers to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), which<br />
have pozzolanic properties and are mainly waste<br />
materials or by-products of no significant value. The<br />
second phase of the project aims at producing<br />
innovative composite materials by developing the use of<br />
these alternative waste materials as stabilisers in SSBs<br />
and investigating the use of these SSBs in a European<br />
context.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Concrete is the most utilised substance in the world<br />
after water. Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), the most<br />
common binder used in concrete, is the most expensive<br />
and energy intensive ingredient in concrete. Due to the<br />
manufacturing process associated with cement<br />
production, approximately 900kg of CO2 is released<br />
into the atmosphere for every tonne of cement<br />
produced. Therefore, it is imperative that alternative<br />
cement replacements are developed. Consequently, the<br />
quantity of cement being manufactured would be<br />
radically reduced. Wide-spread research has been<br />
carried out in the development of cement substitutions.<br />
Ground granulated blasfurnace slag (GGBS), and fly<br />
ash are commonly used in blended cements or as<br />
cement replacements across Europe.<br />
2. Investigation into alternative binders<br />
A full review of various Ordinary Portland Cement<br />
(OPC) replacement materials has been investigated. A<br />
wide range of agricultural and industrial waste products<br />
are examined in terms of their physical and chemical<br />
properties and their suitability as a cementing material<br />
in an attempt to convert waste products into useful<br />
141<br />
construction materials. It has been revealed that the use<br />
of these materials in concrete or soil blocks not only<br />
reduce their cost and embodied energy, but also<br />
improve their structural performance. It is obvious that<br />
different substitution materials will have different<br />
effects on the properties of concrete due to their<br />
chemical and physical characteristics, so it is vital that<br />
these characteristics are considered and analysed<br />
thoroughly.<br />
3. Concrete Block Testing<br />
Concrete containing both 10% and 20% of the<br />
various waste materials was tested in terms of<br />
workability, permeability, shrinkage, durability and<br />
strength at 3, 7, 1, 28, 56 and 90 days. The various tests<br />
were carried out on 100x100mm cubes and 150 dia.<br />
x300mm cylinders. Durability tests included the<br />
concretes resistance to sulphate attack and chloride<br />
ingress. From these test results, the most successful<br />
replacement was determined in terms of strength and<br />
durability with respect to concrete.<br />
4. Stabilised Soil Block Testing<br />
In terms of masonry blocks, compressive strength<br />
isn’t the most critical characteristic. Assuming the soil<br />
is adequately compressed and suitable soil is used in the<br />
making of the blocks, avoiding the use of topsoil with<br />
high levels of organic matter, the target strength should<br />
be met. Durability is the main concern with SSBs. The<br />
ability of the soil in the blocks to resist prevailing rain,<br />
wetting and drying cycles, freezing and thawing cycles,<br />
and chemical attack are critical issues if there are<br />
applicable in a European climate. The testing of the<br />
SSBs, incorporating the waste material as a stabilizer,<br />
will mainly focus on durability tests. The most common<br />
method used in the manufacturing of SSBs is a hand<br />
press for compacting the blocks. A more efficient<br />
method, which will be considered as part of this project,<br />
is to use an electric or diesel powered machine that<br />
have high production rates.<br />
5. Conclusions<br />
Through this research project the successful use of<br />
SSBs, incorporating a waste material sourced in Ireland<br />
as a stabilizer instead of cement, in a European context<br />
will be proven.<br />
6. Acknowledgements<br />
The first author would like to thank the Irish<br />
Research Council for Science, Engineering and<br />
Technology (IRCSET) EMBARK Funding Initiative,<br />
who are funding this research project.