29.06.2013 Views

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cost-Effective Sustainable Construction Technology.<br />

Declan Gavigan 1 & Jamie Goggins 2<br />

National University of Ireland, <strong>Galway</strong>, Ireland.<br />

1) D.Gavigan1@nuigalway.ie, 2) Jamie.Goggins@nuigalway.ie<br />

Abstract<br />

Through this research project, the development of a<br />

novel cost-effective sustainable composite building<br />

technology or product for use in a European context<br />

will be proven through extensive testing in terms of<br />

durability, strength and appearance. In particular,<br />

composite materials comprising of locally sourced<br />

materials that have low impact on the environment are<br />

being developed. One construction technology used in<br />

developing countries that has very low impact on the<br />

environment is stabilised soil blocks (SSBs). The blocks<br />

are low-cost as their main component, the soil, is<br />

sourced locally, often directly from the site of<br />

construction and the main stabiliser used in their<br />

manufacture is cement. Further, these blocks can be<br />

produced on site, saving in transportation costs.<br />

This research project is separated into two phases;<br />

the first phase investigates alternative binders and<br />

stabilisers to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), which<br />

have pozzolanic properties and are mainly waste<br />

materials or by-products of no significant value. The<br />

second phase of the project aims at producing<br />

innovative composite materials by developing the use of<br />

these alternative waste materials as stabilisers in SSBs<br />

and investigating the use of these SSBs in a European<br />

context.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Concrete is the most utilised substance in the world<br />

after water. Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), the most<br />

common binder used in concrete, is the most expensive<br />

and energy intensive ingredient in concrete. Due to the<br />

manufacturing process associated with cement<br />

production, approximately 900kg of CO2 is released<br />

into the atmosphere for every tonne of cement<br />

produced. Therefore, it is imperative that alternative<br />

cement replacements are developed. Consequently, the<br />

quantity of cement being manufactured would be<br />

radically reduced. Wide-spread research has been<br />

carried out in the development of cement substitutions.<br />

Ground granulated blasfurnace slag (GGBS), and fly<br />

ash are commonly used in blended cements or as<br />

cement replacements across Europe.<br />

2. Investigation into alternative binders<br />

A full review of various Ordinary Portland Cement<br />

(OPC) replacement materials has been investigated. A<br />

wide range of agricultural and industrial waste products<br />

are examined in terms of their physical and chemical<br />

properties and their suitability as a cementing material<br />

in an attempt to convert waste products into useful<br />

141<br />

construction materials. It has been revealed that the use<br />

of these materials in concrete or soil blocks not only<br />

reduce their cost and embodied energy, but also<br />

improve their structural performance. It is obvious that<br />

different substitution materials will have different<br />

effects on the properties of concrete due to their<br />

chemical and physical characteristics, so it is vital that<br />

these characteristics are considered and analysed<br />

thoroughly.<br />

3. Concrete Block Testing<br />

Concrete containing both 10% and 20% of the<br />

various waste materials was tested in terms of<br />

workability, permeability, shrinkage, durability and<br />

strength at 3, 7, 1, 28, 56 and 90 days. The various tests<br />

were carried out on 100x100mm cubes and 150 dia.<br />

x300mm cylinders. Durability tests included the<br />

concretes resistance to sulphate attack and chloride<br />

ingress. From these test results, the most successful<br />

replacement was determined in terms of strength and<br />

durability with respect to concrete.<br />

4. Stabilised Soil Block Testing<br />

In terms of masonry blocks, compressive strength<br />

isn’t the most critical characteristic. Assuming the soil<br />

is adequately compressed and suitable soil is used in the<br />

making of the blocks, avoiding the use of topsoil with<br />

high levels of organic matter, the target strength should<br />

be met. Durability is the main concern with SSBs. The<br />

ability of the soil in the blocks to resist prevailing rain,<br />

wetting and drying cycles, freezing and thawing cycles,<br />

and chemical attack are critical issues if there are<br />

applicable in a European climate. The testing of the<br />

SSBs, incorporating the waste material as a stabilizer,<br />

will mainly focus on durability tests. The most common<br />

method used in the manufacturing of SSBs is a hand<br />

press for compacting the blocks. A more efficient<br />

method, which will be considered as part of this project,<br />

is to use an electric or diesel powered machine that<br />

have high production rates.<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

Through this research project the successful use of<br />

SSBs, incorporating a waste material sourced in Ireland<br />

as a stabilizer instead of cement, in a European context<br />

will be proven.<br />

6. Acknowledgements<br />

The first author would like to thank the Irish<br />

Research Council for Science, Engineering and<br />

Technology (IRCSET) EMBARK Funding Initiative,<br />

who are funding this research project.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!