29.06.2013 Views

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

New Analysis Techniques for ICU Data:<br />

Allocating Uncertainty over Time<br />

Enda O’Connor, Michael G. Madden<br />

College of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland, <strong>Galway</strong><br />

e.oconnor2@nuigalway.ie, Michael.Madden@nuigalway.ie<br />

Abstract<br />

This goal of this project is to optimise the performance<br />

of a dynamic Bayesian network by varying how<br />

uncertainty is applied across each node. The approach<br />

taken is inspired by simulated annealing [4] which is an<br />

optimization technique. There are many different types<br />

of uncertainty involved in these model types, however<br />

the focus of this research will be data uncertainty and<br />

the model parameter uncertainty and the trade off<br />

between the two over time.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

A key problem being dealt with in the course of this<br />

research is how an ICU patient can vary greatly over<br />

time from a healthy person but also from other patients.<br />

In order to overcome this issue it is proposed that the<br />

uncertainty applied to dynamic Bayesian network is<br />

alter and varied over time for both model parameters<br />

and data.<br />

The reasoning for this is that data is used to calibrate<br />

a model to a patient, however it is possible that the data<br />

used contains uncertainty. If the models are well<br />

calibrated and the measurements do not fit well it is<br />

possible to apply greater uncertainty to the data and say<br />

the measurements are at fault. During the calibration<br />

period it is a wish to balance both types of uncertainty.<br />

This will be done by applying greater uncertainty to<br />

the model parameters at first as we trust the measured<br />

values as this is the only information available, then in<br />

the later stages greater uncertainty is applied to the data<br />

as we trust the model parameters are a good fit and we<br />

are accounting for any numerical errors due to incorrect<br />

measurements in the data.<br />

To test this we will use the models proposed by<br />

Enright et al [1,2]. These models are a dynamic<br />

Bayesian network representation of Bergman’s ICU-<br />

MM which is explained by Van Herpe et al [3].<br />

2. Methods<br />

The approach being used here involves using the<br />

abstract example proposed by Enright et al [2]. A<br />

number of tests were carried out by altering the<br />

standard deviation and mean in order to see what results<br />

were obtained.<br />

It was found that the model will converge even<br />

when starting values are not correct. When a very<br />

narrow standard deviation was applied to the model it<br />

would not behave correctly and would reset at certain<br />

time-steps as there was no evidence matching the<br />

samples generated by the model. However with larger<br />

standard deviations it was found that the variables could<br />

43<br />

retune and from a current approximation and fit with a<br />

later value that matches the evidence. To do this an<br />

optimization technique will be applied to vary the<br />

uncertainty and produce the best possible outcome.<br />

3. Conclusions<br />

This project aims to deal with the optimising the<br />

output of a dynamic Bayesian network. The data being<br />

used is targeted specifically at the problem of blood<br />

glucose levels however, it would be ideal to apply this<br />

research to many other data sets using a dynamic<br />

Bayesian network. There are two core concepts that<br />

need to be studied and understood; probabilistic<br />

reasoning over time and optimisation techniques.<br />

4. References<br />

[1] C. G. Enright, M. G. Madden, S. J. Russell, N. Aleks, G.<br />

Manley, J. Laffey, B. Harte, A. Mulvey, N. Madden.<br />

Modelling Glycaemia in ICU Patients: A Dynamic Bayesian<br />

Network Approach. 2010.<br />

[2] C. G. Enright, M. G. Madden, N. Madden. Derivation of<br />

DBN Structure from Expert Knowledge in the Form of<br />

Mathematical Models. 2011.<br />

[3] A minimal model for glycemia control in critically ill<br />

patients. T. Van Herpe, B. Pluymers, M. Espinoza, G. Van<br />

den Berghe, B. De Moor. New York City, USA : IEEE, 2006.<br />

[4] S. Russel, P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern<br />

Approach. 2003. pp 115-116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!