NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Computational Modeling of Ceramic-based Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds<br />
Doyle, H. 1 , McHugh, P.E. 1<br />
1 Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, <strong>NUI</strong> <strong>Galway</strong>, Ireland<br />
Email: h.doyle1@nuigalway.ie<br />
Abstract<br />
Biomaterial bone scaffolds are required to have a<br />
unique combination of stiff mechanical properties and<br />
high porosity to ensure cell differentiation. In this work,<br />
a finite element analysis is conducted to determine the<br />
effects of varying scaffold material properties and<br />
geometry on scaffold performance.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Tissue engineering biomaterial scaffolds have the<br />
potential to facilitate the regeneration of damaged or<br />
diseased bone tissue. For effective scaffold<br />
performance, high porosity and pore interconnectivity<br />
are required to ensure cell penetration; in addition,<br />
adequate mechanical properties to support physiological<br />
loads during tissue regeneration are required.<br />
The aim of this research is to address the need for<br />
detailed micro-structural design of these scaffolds to<br />
optimize their performance, by using high-resolution<br />
computational modeling in combination with<br />
experimental analysis of manufactured bone scaffolds<br />
for validation.<br />
2. Methods<br />
High resolution finite element models of repeatable<br />
scaffold geometries [1] , see Fig. 1, were modeled under<br />
1% compression using Abaqus finite element (FE)<br />
software. Two different scaffold geometries (labeled the<br />
0/90 and Luxner geometries [1] ) were modeled, and each<br />
was run with three different material properties (PCL,<br />
PCL-Ha and Ha). The maximum and minimum<br />
principal stress and strain distributions were analyzed to<br />
compare the performance of the different geometries<br />
and materials.<br />
Figure 1: Scaffold geometries (a) 0/90 and (b)<br />
Luxner.<br />
3. Results<br />
The results of this analysis show a very similar strain<br />
distribution with mode values at -0.3% and +0.2% for<br />
maximum and minimum principal strain distributions<br />
65<br />
respectively for both geometries. The compressive<br />
stress results for both 0/90 and Luxner scaffolds are<br />
shown in Fig. 2. Both tensile and compressive stresses<br />
in the Luxner PCL-Ha scaffold were further away from<br />
the material strength than for other materials, and<br />
stresses were more evenly distributed in the 0/90 PCL-<br />
Ha scaffold compared to the other materials.<br />
Figure 2: Minimum principal stress results for 0/90<br />
and Luxner scaffolds.<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
These results indicate that the strains experienced by<br />
the scaffolds may not be very different. As the strain<br />
experienced by cells seeded on scaffolds has been<br />
shown to influence cell differentiation [2] , this may mean<br />
that cell differentiation in this case would be<br />
independent of material or geometry.<br />
Increasing the ceramic content of the scaffolds<br />
should, by rule of mixtures, increase scaffold stiffness.<br />
The results show this to be true for the 0/90 scaffold but<br />
not for the Luxner scaffold. The reasons for this result<br />
need to be studied further.<br />
Luxner PCL-Ha scaffold stresses were shown to be<br />
further away from the material strength than for the<br />
other materials indicating that it is less likely to fail and<br />
therefore more suitable for scaffold fabrication. Stops [2]<br />
has shown that stress concentrations in a scaffold can<br />
lead to failure. This suggests that failure is less likely to<br />
occur in the 0/90 PCL-Ha scaffold than for the other<br />
materials.<br />
7. Acknowledgements<br />
EMBARK scholarship from the Irish Research<br />
Council for Science, Engineering and Technology.<br />
8. References<br />
[1] Cahill, S., M.Eng.Sc., <strong>NUI</strong> <strong>Galway</strong>, 2009.<br />
[2] Stops, A. PhD, <strong>NUI</strong> <strong>Galway</strong>, 2009.