29.06.2013 Views

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Axial Load Capacity of a Driven Cast-in-Situ Pile in Mixed Ground<br />

Conditions<br />

Mr. Kevin Flynn and Dr. Bryan McCabe<br />

College of Engineering and Informatics, <strong>NUI</strong> <strong>Galway</strong><br />

k.flynn8@nuigalway.ie<br />

Abstract<br />

Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are used extensively<br />

in piling projects in the UK. Due to the lack of<br />

knowledge on the axial load behaviour of DCIS piles, a<br />

static load test was conducted on an instrumented pile<br />

in mixed ground conditions at Pontarddulais, Wales.<br />

The test results showed that the pile was influenced by<br />

residual load due to curing which significantly altered<br />

the load distribution at failure.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are classified as a<br />

type of displacement pile [1]. The installation process<br />

involves driving an open-ended steel tube with an<br />

expendable driving shoe. Upon reaching the required<br />

depth of penetration, the reinforcement is inserted into<br />

the tube, followed by concreting via a skip. The tube is<br />

then withdrawn and the concrete is left to cure in-situ<br />

for a number of days. Despite the popularity of DCIS<br />

piles, there is a surprising lack of literature on their axial<br />

load behaviour. A static load test was performed on an<br />

instrumented DCIS pile in order to assess the axial load<br />

behaviour as part of an overall study to estimate pile<br />

capacity based on measurements during installation.<br />

2. Ground Conditions<br />

The ground investigation consisted of 3 no. cone<br />

penetration tests (CPT) at the pile test location. Each<br />

test was specified to penetrate to a minimum depth of 10<br />

m. The tests revealed mixed ground conditions<br />

consisting of 1.5 m of dense fill overlying 3 m of soft<br />

clay, followed by 1.5 m of medium dense silty sand. A<br />

1.2 m layer of firm clay was encountered at 6 m,<br />

followed by sand of varying density to a depth of 10 m.<br />

The water table was located at 2 m below ground level<br />

according to borehole reports.<br />

3. DCIS Test Pile<br />

The DCIS test pile was 340 mm in diameter and 8.5<br />

m in length. The pile was instrumented with 16 no.<br />

vibrating wire strain gauges in order to obtain the load<br />

distribution during testing. Strain readings were taken<br />

before and after installation of the reinforcement, and<br />

immediately prior to commencing the pile load test.<br />

Analysis of the readings revealed that the pile was<br />

experiencing significant tensile strains as a result of<br />

swelling during curing, which results in the<br />

development of residual load [2].<br />

145<br />

4. Static Load Test<br />

A static load test was conducted approximately 9<br />

days after pile installation. The pile was subjected to<br />

three loading/unloading cycles, with failure occurring at<br />

a load of 935 kN. The strain gauges enabled the load<br />

distribution along the pile at failure to be obtained<br />

(Figure 1). The distribution was significantly affected<br />

by the residual load which developed during curing,<br />

with the base resistance accounting for approximately<br />

31 % of the ultimate load.<br />

Figure 1 - Load distribution in DCIS test pile at failure<br />

6. Conclusions<br />

The concrete curing process for DCIS piles results in<br />

the development of residual load which alters the load<br />

distribution obtained from a static load test.<br />

7. Acknowledgements<br />

The authors wish to acknowledge Keller Foundations<br />

UK for sponsoring this research project.<br />

8. References<br />

[1] Tomlinson, M, Pile Design and Construction Practice,<br />

Taylor & Francis, 1994.<br />

[2] Kim, M., Cavusoglu, E., O’Neill, M., Roberts, T. and Yin,<br />

S, “Residual load Development in ACIP Piles in a Bridge<br />

Foundation”, GeoSupport 2004, pp. 223-235.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!