NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Axial Load Capacity of a Driven Cast-in-Situ Pile in Mixed Ground<br />
Conditions<br />
Mr. Kevin Flynn and Dr. Bryan McCabe<br />
College of Engineering and Informatics, <strong>NUI</strong> <strong>Galway</strong><br />
k.flynn8@nuigalway.ie<br />
Abstract<br />
Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are used extensively<br />
in piling projects in the UK. Due to the lack of<br />
knowledge on the axial load behaviour of DCIS piles, a<br />
static load test was conducted on an instrumented pile<br />
in mixed ground conditions at Pontarddulais, Wales.<br />
The test results showed that the pile was influenced by<br />
residual load due to curing which significantly altered<br />
the load distribution at failure.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are classified as a<br />
type of displacement pile [1]. The installation process<br />
involves driving an open-ended steel tube with an<br />
expendable driving shoe. Upon reaching the required<br />
depth of penetration, the reinforcement is inserted into<br />
the tube, followed by concreting via a skip. The tube is<br />
then withdrawn and the concrete is left to cure in-situ<br />
for a number of days. Despite the popularity of DCIS<br />
piles, there is a surprising lack of literature on their axial<br />
load behaviour. A static load test was performed on an<br />
instrumented DCIS pile in order to assess the axial load<br />
behaviour as part of an overall study to estimate pile<br />
capacity based on measurements during installation.<br />
2. Ground Conditions<br />
The ground investigation consisted of 3 no. cone<br />
penetration tests (CPT) at the pile test location. Each<br />
test was specified to penetrate to a minimum depth of 10<br />
m. The tests revealed mixed ground conditions<br />
consisting of 1.5 m of dense fill overlying 3 m of soft<br />
clay, followed by 1.5 m of medium dense silty sand. A<br />
1.2 m layer of firm clay was encountered at 6 m,<br />
followed by sand of varying density to a depth of 10 m.<br />
The water table was located at 2 m below ground level<br />
according to borehole reports.<br />
3. DCIS Test Pile<br />
The DCIS test pile was 340 mm in diameter and 8.5<br />
m in length. The pile was instrumented with 16 no.<br />
vibrating wire strain gauges in order to obtain the load<br />
distribution during testing. Strain readings were taken<br />
before and after installation of the reinforcement, and<br />
immediately prior to commencing the pile load test.<br />
Analysis of the readings revealed that the pile was<br />
experiencing significant tensile strains as a result of<br />
swelling during curing, which results in the<br />
development of residual load [2].<br />
145<br />
4. Static Load Test<br />
A static load test was conducted approximately 9<br />
days after pile installation. The pile was subjected to<br />
three loading/unloading cycles, with failure occurring at<br />
a load of 935 kN. The strain gauges enabled the load<br />
distribution along the pile at failure to be obtained<br />
(Figure 1). The distribution was significantly affected<br />
by the residual load which developed during curing,<br />
with the base resistance accounting for approximately<br />
31 % of the ultimate load.<br />
Figure 1 - Load distribution in DCIS test pile at failure<br />
6. Conclusions<br />
The concrete curing process for DCIS piles results in<br />
the development of residual load which alters the load<br />
distribution obtained from a static load test.<br />
7. Acknowledgements<br />
The authors wish to acknowledge Keller Foundations<br />
UK for sponsoring this research project.<br />
8. References<br />
[1] Tomlinson, M, Pile Design and Construction Practice,<br />
Taylor & Francis, 1994.<br />
[2] Kim, M., Cavusoglu, E., O’Neill, M., Roberts, T. and Yin,<br />
S, “Residual load Development in ACIP Piles in a Bridge<br />
Foundation”, GeoSupport 2004, pp. 223-235.