29.06.2013 Views

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

NUI Galway – UL Alliance First Annual ENGINEERING AND - ARAN ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An examination into how stem cells form bone in vivo<br />

Birmingham E. 1 , Niebur G. 2 , McHugh P.E. 1 , McNamara L. 1<br />

1 Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, and National Centre for Biomedical Engineering<br />

Science, <strong>NUI</strong> <strong>Galway</strong>, Ireland. e.birmingham1@nuigalway.ie<br />

2 Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN<br />

46556, USA.<br />

Abstract<br />

Stem cells are capable of forming different types of<br />

tissues such as bone, cartilage and fat when they<br />

receive appropriate cues, such as biochemicals and<br />

mechanical loading. However, the precise cues that<br />

control the tissues that stem cells ultimately grow<br />

remain unclear. The aim of this study is to examine<br />

what are the natural signals stem cells receive from<br />

their environment which stimulate them to form bone.<br />

1. Introduction.<br />

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) within the marrow<br />

of bone are subjected to a unique microenvironment<br />

known as the stem cell niche. Here MSCs can<br />

experience not only biochemical signalling from<br />

surrounding support cells (osteocytes, osteoblasts,<br />

fibroblasts, adipocytes etc.) but also a mechanical<br />

loading influenced by the trabecular bone structure and<br />

marrow composition (1). While both biochemical<br />

signalling from support cells and mechanical loading<br />

have been shown to direct stem cell differentiation in<br />

vitro, their influence within the niche remains largely<br />

unknown.<br />

Our objectives are (a) to examine the role of support<br />

cells on the differentiation of MSCs and (b) to develop<br />

an in vitro model which allows us to apply<br />

physiological loads to MSCs as they reside in the niche.<br />

2. Materials and Methods.<br />

We examined the influence of mechanical loading<br />

on MSCs residing in their natural home of the bone<br />

marrow through the use of a custom built bioreactor<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

Media output<br />

Bone sample<br />

Actuating bar<br />

Media input<br />

Figure 1: Custom built bioreactor used to biomechanically<br />

stimulate explanted ovine bone tissue samples containing the<br />

trabecular structure and marrow.<br />

The function of support cells on MSCs within the stem<br />

cell niche was also examined using conditioned media,<br />

collected from separately cultured osteoblasts or<br />

osteocytes and co-culture studies.<br />

52<br />

These set-ups allow us to delineate the importance of<br />

biochemical signalling between bone’s regulatory cells,<br />

osteoblasts and osteocytes, and MSCs.<br />

3. Results and Discussion.<br />

The support cell study showed a greater expression<br />

of alkaline phosphatase (osteogenic marker) in MSCs<br />

which had been co-cultured with osteocytes rather than<br />

osteoblasts highlighting the role that osteocytes play in<br />

regulating MSC differentiation (Figure 2) (2) and the<br />

importance of examining MSCs in their natural<br />

environment.<br />

Figure 2: ALP activity for MSCs co-cultured with either<br />

osteocytes or osteoblasts.<br />

With our bioreactor we retain this niche environment<br />

and also expose bone samples to physiological loads.<br />

Our preliminary observations show that a dynamic<br />

mechanical loading environment enhances the survival<br />

of the bone marrow in vitro (Figure 3), whereas<br />

unloaded static samples degraded in the first two weeks.<br />

Figure 3: Histological section of trabecular bone and marrow<br />

stained with H&E.<br />

Future results from different loading regimes could<br />

provide valuable information on the role of<br />

mechanotransduction on bone development in vivo.<br />

5. References<br />

1. Kuhn et al., J Cell Physiol, 222, pp. 268-277, 2010<br />

2. Heino et al., Exp Cell Res, 294, pp. 458-468, 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!