02.07.2013 Views

Electrical Power Systems

Electrical Power Systems

Electrical Power Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

420 <strong>Electrical</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>Systems</strong><br />

rom eqn. (i),<br />

rom eqn. (ii),<br />

Pg1 = l-41<br />

035 .<br />

P g2 =<br />

114 . l - 41<br />

0. 35 + 0. 002l<br />

solving eqns. (iii) and (iv) iteratively, we get<br />

l = 117.6 Rs/MWhr<br />

P g1 = 218.857 MW, P g2 = 159.029 MW.<br />

and power loss<br />

P L = 0.001(P g2 – 70) 2 MW<br />

\ P L = 0.001(159.029 – 70) 2 MW = 7.926 MW<br />

Now as a check,<br />

P g1 + P g2 – P L<br />

= ( 218.857 + 159.029 – 7.926) MW<br />

= 369.96 MW (close enough to 370 MW).<br />

16.7 PHYSICAL SIGNIICANCE O l CONSIDERING LOSSES<br />

...(iii)<br />

...(iv)<br />

We will now consider the physical significance of l. In the lossless case (section-16.4), l related<br />

increase in cost rate (Rs/hr) to increase in power demand (MW). Is this still true with losses?<br />

rom eqn. (16.16),<br />

DC T =<br />

e j<br />

The power balance equation is written as:<br />

0<br />

m dCi Pgi<br />

å DPgi ...(16.35)<br />

dP<br />

i=1 gi<br />

m<br />

å DPgi – DPL = DPD ...(16.36)<br />

i=1<br />

Now due to increments of load from 0<br />

PD to ( 0 0<br />

PD + DPD), corresponding optimal Pgi has also<br />

0 0<br />

changed from Pgi to ( Pgi + DPgi). Thus, line loss expression is written as:<br />

0 0 0<br />

PL = PL ( Pg2 + DPg2 , Pg3 + DPg3 , ... Pgm + DPgm ) ...(16.37)<br />

Expanding the above expression by Taylor series and retaining only the first two terms, we<br />

have,<br />

Then<br />

P L = P L 0 +<br />

e j<br />

m<br />

0<br />

PL Pg<br />

å DPgi ...(16.38)<br />

P<br />

i=2 gi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!