02.07.2013 Views

Electrical Power Systems

Electrical Power Systems

Electrical Power Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Example 16.6: Consider Ex-16.5, with generators limits<br />

125 < P g1 < 300<br />

175 < P g2 < 350<br />

Optimal System Operation 427<br />

100 < P <<br />

g3 300<br />

Determine the optimal dispatch by iterative technique using gradient method.<br />

Solution:<br />

We have seen in Ex-16.5 that equality constraint was satisfied in two iterations and there<br />

was no generator limit. In this case constraint is imposed on generator output.<br />

After 2nd iteration (Ex-16.5), we have,<br />

Pg1 = 258.669 MW<br />

Pg2 = 373.0035 MW<br />

Pg3 = 218.335 MW.<br />

But Pg2 exceeds its upper limit. Thus, this unit is pegged at its upper limit. Hence Pg2 = 350 MW<br />

and is kept constant at this value. Thus, the new imbalance in power is<br />

\ DP g (2) = 23 MW.<br />

rom eqn. (16.52), we have,<br />

DP g (2) = 850 – (258.669 + 350.0 + 218.335)<br />

Dl (2) =<br />

23<br />

1 1<br />

+<br />

2 ´ 015 . 2 ´ 018 .<br />

= 3.763<br />

\ l (3) = l (2) + Dl (2) = 118.6007 + 3.763<br />

\ l (3) = 122.3637.<br />

or the 3rd iteration, we have<br />

and<br />

122. 3637 - 41<br />

Pg1 = = 271.21 MW<br />

2 ´ 015 .<br />

Pg2 = 350 MW<br />

P g3 =<br />

122. 3637 - 40<br />

= 228.79 MW<br />

2 ´ 018 .<br />

DP g (3) = 850 – (271.21 + 350 + 228.79) = 0.0<br />

DP g (3) = 0.0, and the equality comstraint is met and Pg1 and P g3 are within their limits. Thus, the<br />

optimal dispatch is<br />

Pg1 = 271.21 MW<br />

Pg2 = 350.0 MW

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!