04.08.2013 Views

Html - PUMA CATch up

Html - PUMA CATch up

Html - PUMA CATch up

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

p : 69 | c : 3 <strong>PUMA</strong>.SAfe<br />

f.16 t.1<br />

f.17 t.1<br />

7. 8 3 %<br />

2012 final audiT key non-compliance issues 2012 worker complainTs By major failure caTegory<br />

Figure 16: The diagram shows the percentage of areas in which factories<br />

failed to comply with <strong>PUMA</strong>’s standards<br />

In 2012, factory workers in China, Indonesia,<br />

Vietnam, Cambodia, Bangladesh, India,<br />

Americas and EMEA contacted <strong>PUMA</strong>.Safe<br />

directly to complain about workplace issues.<br />

109 issues were raised in various areas,<br />

with wage-related issues coming out as<br />

the main complaint area. These complaints<br />

came from factories across all grade classifications.<br />

<strong>PUMA</strong> BUSineSS And SUStAinABility RePoRt 2012<br />

Basic h&s<br />

environmenTal<br />

4 .0 0 % 6 %<br />

managemenT<br />

h&s managemenT<br />

6. 8 5 % 2 2 .7 3 %<br />

7 %<br />

freedom of associaTion<br />

8 . 49 %<br />

1. 31 %<br />

2 .74 %<br />

1 %<br />

0.77% 1 %<br />

2 .0 8 %<br />

2 %<br />

8.87 %<br />

8 .9 3 %<br />

wages<br />

general hr<br />

managemenT<br />

BenefiTs<br />

7 %<br />

14 .6 8 %<br />

working hours<br />

grievance procedure<br />

conTracTs/Terms of<br />

employmenT<br />

dormiTory/welfare<br />

12 %<br />

10.7 3 %<br />

ameniTies<br />

harassmenT<br />

oThers<br />

12 %<br />

18 %<br />

Bringing our social<br />

compliance and performance<br />

sTandards <strong>up</strong> To speed<br />

<strong>PUMA</strong>.Safe initiated a review of its stakeholder<br />

engagement, monitoring and remediation<br />

systems and procedures that also<br />

analyzed incidents of 2011 and 2012. It<br />

was clear that <strong>PUMA</strong> had to strengthen<br />

and <strong>up</strong>date its systems in order to better<br />

3 4 %<br />

wages<br />

working hours<br />

conTracTs and Terms<br />

of employmenT<br />

forced laBor<br />

oThers<br />

BenefiTs<br />

harassmenT and aBuse<br />

Basic h&s<br />

general hr<br />

managemenT<br />

dormiTories and<br />

welfare ameniTies<br />

Figure 17: The diagram shows the percentage of issues that workers complained about<br />

address s<strong>up</strong>ply chain challenges. <strong>PUMA</strong>.<br />

Safe strengthened its collaboration in terms<br />

of audits with other brands that <strong>PUMA</strong> is<br />

sharing production facilities with so that<br />

also audit results can be shared.<br />

<strong>PUMA</strong>.Safe s<strong>up</strong>ported the development of<br />

the Core and Follow-Up Questions of the<br />

Sustainable Compliance Initiative (SCI) tool<br />

of the Fair Labor Association (FLA). <strong>PUMA</strong>.<br />

Safe initiated a restructuring of its tool<br />

incorporating both the tools of the ILO/Better<br />

Work program and the Core/Follow-Up<br />

questions of the FLA SCI. The ILO/Better<br />

Work tool is designed to be universally<br />

accepted because it is founded on ILO Core<br />

Conventions as well as national government<br />

input. The FLA SCI is aimed to be a performance<br />

management benchmark to attain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!