16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

practice is not just an aggregate <strong>of</strong>people and is not a synonym for an arbitrary group,<br />

team or network (Wenger 1998).<br />

An essential component <strong>of</strong>any practice is essentially what it takes to cohere to make<br />

mutual engagement possible. Inclusion <strong>in</strong> what matters is a prerequisite for be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

engaged <strong>in</strong> a community's practice. The k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong>coherence that transforms mutual<br />

engagement <strong>in</strong>to a community <strong>of</strong>practice requires concerted effort. Wenger (1998)<br />

describes the concept 'community ma<strong>in</strong>tenance' as be<strong>in</strong>g an '<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic part' <strong>of</strong>any<br />

practice. However, because it may be much less visible than the more <strong>in</strong>strumental<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong>that practice, it can be easily undervalued or not recognised (ibid.). Proactive<br />

steps have to be taken to ensure mutual engagement is transformed <strong>in</strong>to a community <strong>of</strong><br />

practice (ibid.).<br />

Mutual engagement <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice does not entail a homogenous group<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

<strong>in</strong> fact, the mutual engagement <strong>in</strong> a practice is more productive when there is diversity <strong>in</strong><br />

the group<strong>in</strong>g. Not only are members <strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong>practice different, but also<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g together creates differences as well as similarities. In as much as they develop<br />

shared ways <strong>of</strong>do<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs, members also dist<strong>in</strong>guish themselves or ga<strong>in</strong> a reputation.<br />

Each participant <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice f<strong>in</strong>ds a unique place and ga<strong>in</strong>s a unique<br />

identity, which is both further <strong>in</strong>tegrated and further def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong>engagement<br />

<strong>in</strong> the community <strong>of</strong>practice. ':Homogeneity is neither a requirement for, nor the result<br />

<strong>of</strong>, the development <strong>of</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice" (Wenger 1998:76). Mutual engagement<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves not merely the competence <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual participant but the competence <strong>of</strong>all<br />

participants. Mutual engagement draws on what participants do and what they know as<br />

well as their ability to connect mean<strong>in</strong>gfully to what they do not do and do not know, that<br />

is, the ability to connect mean<strong>in</strong>gfully to the contributions and knowledge <strong>of</strong>others. It is<br />

therefore important to know how to give and receive help. Develop<strong>in</strong>g a shared practice<br />

depends on mutual engagement.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!