16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

necessary to learn what they needed to learn <strong>in</strong> order to make decisions that fully engaged<br />

their own knowledge base.<br />

The dilemma <strong>of</strong>mak<strong>in</strong>g available too much <strong>of</strong>material to teachers at workshops to<br />

appease teachers' need for 'handouts', (worksheets, booklets, packages and lesson plans<br />

etc.) versus the need for teachers to participate <strong>in</strong> the practice <strong>of</strong> the community can be<br />

analysed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>Wenger's concepts <strong>of</strong> 'participation' and 'reification'. It was about<br />

strik<strong>in</strong>g a balance between creat<strong>in</strong>g opportunities for teachers' active engagement with<br />

materials, and the development <strong>of</strong>their own materials and simply 'spoon feed<strong>in</strong>g'<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g material for use by teachers. <strong>Teacher</strong>s <strong>in</strong> their quest to make mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

economic phenomena needed some material to start from, but also needed to engage with<br />

the material and develop their own material <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong>simply 'receiv<strong>in</strong>g' and us<strong>in</strong>g what<br />

someone else had developed.<br />

Negotiation <strong>of</strong>mean<strong>in</strong>g had to be viewed as a be<strong>in</strong>g a dual process <strong>of</strong>participation and<br />

reification (Wenger 1998). It leads to trade-<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the complementarity <strong>of</strong><br />

participation and reification. Mean<strong>in</strong>g was likely to become a problem <strong>in</strong> practice if too<br />

much reliance was placed on one at the expense <strong>of</strong>the other. Ifparticipation prevailed,<br />

that is, ifmost <strong>of</strong>what matters was left unreified, then there may not have been enough<br />

material to anchor the specificities <strong>of</strong>coord<strong>in</strong>ation and to cover diverg<strong>in</strong>g assumptions. If<br />

reification prevailed, ifeveryth<strong>in</strong>g was reified, but with little opportunity for shared<br />

experience and <strong>in</strong>teractive negotiation, then there may not have been enough overlap <strong>in</strong><br />

participation to recover a coord<strong>in</strong>ated, relevant, or generative mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

7.4.3 Broker<strong>in</strong>g<br />

While teachers belonged to the TEMS community, they were also affiliated to other<br />

communities. C<strong>in</strong>dy was the co-ord<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>of</strong>the TEMS project, member <strong>of</strong>the<br />

Mathematics committee and the head <strong>of</strong>the Languages committee <strong>in</strong> her region. Mary<br />

and Debbie were members <strong>of</strong>both the Mathematics and the Languages committee. John<br />

was the regional Mathematics co-ord<strong>in</strong>ator and a member <strong>of</strong>the Languages committee.<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!