16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In this study, the criteria for the selection <strong>of</strong>the teachers <strong>in</strong>cluded their (lack <strong>of</strong>) EMS<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g experience, their commitment to the teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>this learn<strong>in</strong>g area, and their<br />

commitment to participation <strong>in</strong> the TEMS project.<br />

After the <strong>in</strong>itial workshop, eleven teachers committed themselves to the TEMS project.<br />

It was important for me to earn the trust and respect <strong>of</strong> teachers and to develop a mutually<br />

-satisfy<strong>in</strong>g relationship with each one <strong>of</strong>them. Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g access to teachers' lives and work<br />

had to be built on trust and mutual respect. This proved to be crucial when it came to<br />

ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g access to teachers' classrooms.<br />

4.5.5 Triangulation<br />

The use <strong>of</strong>these multiple data collection methods has merit. Denz<strong>in</strong> (cited <strong>in</strong> Mouton<br />

1996: 167) co<strong>in</strong>ed the term 'triangulation' to refer to multiple methods <strong>of</strong>data collection<br />

which complement each other, thereby balanc<strong>in</strong>g out their respective shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Merriam (1988:69) argues that"... the rationale for this strategy is that the flaws <strong>of</strong>one<br />

method are <strong>of</strong>ten the strength <strong>of</strong>another, and by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g methods, observers can<br />

achieve the best <strong>of</strong>each, while overcom<strong>in</strong>g their unique deficiencies". However, Patton<br />

(1980:330) asserts that there is "no magic <strong>in</strong> triangulation", that is, the researcher us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

different methods should not expect f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs generated by different methods to fall <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

coherent picture. A similar criticism <strong>of</strong>the romanticism associated with the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

triangulation is presented by McFee (1992). He argues that while triangulation between<br />

methods compares two research solutions to a s<strong>in</strong>gle problem <strong>in</strong> an effort to validate<br />

outcomes, it is premised on the claim that both methods are <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the same th<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

". " there is an <strong>in</strong>timate connection between methods and issues, so one cannot<br />

triangulate between methods unless one can be sure that both (or all) <strong>of</strong>the methods<br />

address the same issues" (ibid.:217).<br />

4.5.6 Reflexivity<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!