16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wenger emphasises (1998) that although the term 'community' usually has positive<br />

connotations <strong>of</strong>peaceful coexistence, mutual support or <strong>in</strong>terpersonal allegiance, these<br />

are not assumed, though they may exist <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> cases. Communities <strong>of</strong>practice can be<br />

characterised by conflicts, disagreements and tensions among participants. These are<br />

'normal' forms <strong>of</strong>participation. A shared practice thus connects participants to each other<br />

<strong>in</strong> ways that are diverse and complex.<br />

3.3.2.3.2 How is 'jo<strong>in</strong>t enterprise' a characteristic <strong>of</strong> practice as a source <strong>of</strong><br />

community coherence?<br />

The negotiation <strong>of</strong>a jo<strong>in</strong>t enterprise that keeps a keeps a community <strong>of</strong>practice together<br />

is based on three premises (Wenger 1998). Firstly, the enterprise is a result <strong>of</strong>a collective<br />

process <strong>of</strong>negotiation that reflects the full complexity <strong>of</strong>mutual engagement; secondly,<br />

the enterprise is def<strong>in</strong>ed by the participants <strong>in</strong> the very process <strong>of</strong>pursu<strong>in</strong>g the enterprise;<br />

and thirdly, the enterprise creates among participants relations <strong>of</strong>mutual accountability<br />

that become an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <strong>of</strong>the practice.<br />

The enterprises reflected <strong>in</strong> practice are as complex as the participants. l This enterprise<br />

therefore <strong>in</strong>cludes the <strong>in</strong>strumental, personal and <strong>in</strong>terpersonal aspects <strong>of</strong>participants'<br />

lives. A community <strong>of</strong>practice reflects its attempt to create a context <strong>in</strong> which<br />

participants can proceed with their work<strong>in</strong>g lives. A participant's work<strong>in</strong>g life <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g money, be<strong>in</strong>g an adult, becom<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>icient at one's job, feel<strong>in</strong>g good, deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with boredom, keep<strong>in</strong>g one's job and th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about the future.<br />

Communities <strong>of</strong>practice are 'not self-conta<strong>in</strong>ed' entities, but develop <strong>in</strong> larger historical,<br />

social, and <strong>in</strong>stitutional contexts, with specific resources and constra<strong>in</strong>ts (Wenger 1998).<br />

Although the practice <strong>of</strong>the community may be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by conditions outside the<br />

control <strong>of</strong>its members (time, resources etc) the practice is still produced by the<br />

participants with<strong>in</strong> the resources and constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong>their situations and is therefore their<br />

response to their conditions. Participants are, however, certa<strong>in</strong>ly located with<strong>in</strong> a broader<br />

I In the TEMS project, the enterprise would be personal and pr<strong>of</strong>essional development.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!