16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for the purposes <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essional development has been around for a long time (Day<br />

. 1999). Pr<strong>of</strong>essional development through network<strong>in</strong>g via teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities<br />

suggests that teachers understand that learn<strong>in</strong>g only from experience will limit<br />

development. <strong>Teacher</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g communities allow teachers to come together and learn<br />

from one another and to engage with curricular issues. It is the response to an important<br />

issue and that is that responsibility for cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essional development simply<br />

cannot be left to 'others' (namely bureaucrats <strong>in</strong> the department <strong>of</strong>education).<br />

Christie et al (2004) rem<strong>in</strong>d us about the power and potential <strong>of</strong>human agency and<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> engag<strong>in</strong>g with CPD but warn that this must be complemented by state<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement. They suggest that the Department <strong>of</strong>Education take ownership and<br />

responsibility for CPD programmes and lend supportto voluntary formations such as<br />

teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities so as to enhance their susta<strong>in</strong>ability. A powerful feature <strong>of</strong><br />

teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g communities is that they lend themselves to teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

autonomy, where teachers <strong>of</strong>their own accord elect to participate <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>of</strong>their own choice. It is not difficult to understand why<br />

contrived networks legislated by Department <strong>of</strong>Education <strong>of</strong>ficials are likely to<br />

encounter resistance from teachers. Such networks <strong>of</strong>ten have as the agenda, the<br />

uncritical implementation <strong>of</strong>new education policy (Day 1999). 'Contrived collegiality'<br />

entrenches power relationships between participants and underm<strong>in</strong>es teachers coerced<br />

<strong>in</strong>to such networks (Hargreaves 1994). In their endeavours to improve student learn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

teachers <strong>of</strong>ten embrace contrived "system-<strong>in</strong>itiated pr<strong>of</strong>essional development<br />

partnerships and collaborations" but later encounter much "emotional turmoil and ripples<br />

<strong>of</strong> change... (that can) ... threaten self-image and self-esteem" (Day 1999: 188). Day<br />

argues that"... the build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>jo<strong>in</strong>t, authentic purpose, trust and mutual understand<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

and the provision <strong>of</strong> support and cont<strong>in</strong>uity ..." are crucial to the development <strong>of</strong><br />

successful collaborative <strong>in</strong>itiatives (ibid.).<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!