16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong>dividual participants changed differed. <strong>Teacher</strong>s' biographies, personal epistemologies<br />

and motivations <strong>in</strong>fluenced the extent to which their learn<strong>in</strong>g 'progressed' <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>the<br />

four elements <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g as espoused by Wenger. While some teachers were attracted by<br />

the excitement <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g new commerce content knowledge, others emphasised the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g pedagogical content knowledge. For some participants, the<br />

social aspect and network<strong>in</strong>g provided by the TEMS project was particularly appeal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

For others, TEMS provided an opportunity to develop and ref<strong>in</strong>e personal identities, a<br />

means for personal growth and advancement.<br />

This chapter provides a detailed narrative vignette <strong>of</strong>one research participant, a strategy<br />

gleaned from Graven (2002). The reason for the selection <strong>of</strong>one teacher is to provide an<br />

analysis us<strong>in</strong>g a 'thick' description (Geertz 1973) so as to illustrate with richness and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed texture the nature <strong>of</strong>the change that had occurred for this teacher. An<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong>this teacher's learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>Wenger's (1998) four components <strong>of</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g is presented. This is summarised and consolidated <strong>in</strong> tabular form and captures<br />

the key difference <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>these four components <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g (see Section 5.7, figure<br />

5.2).<br />

Wenger's framework provides a basis for theoriz<strong>in</strong>g the frame for the data analysis that<br />

follows <strong>in</strong> Chapters Six and Seven. Full data sets for all participat<strong>in</strong>g teachers were<br />

compiled. These <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terviews, lesson observations, records <strong>of</strong>conversations<br />

and <strong>in</strong>teractions with teachers (made <strong>in</strong> myjournal) and data from f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terviews.<br />

Interviews were recorded, transcribed and returned to teachers for verification (see<br />

Chapter 4).<br />

From the data sets, John's data set was selected to demonstrate the nature, extent and<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong>teacher learn<strong>in</strong>g that had occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g the TEMS project. The rationale<br />

for this selection was that John demonstrated the most significant changes with regard to<br />

Wenger's four components <strong>of</strong>leam<strong>in</strong>g. A narrative vignette was constructed from<br />

selective transcripts drawn from <strong>in</strong>terviews, <strong>in</strong>formal conversations, classroom<br />

observations and TEMS workshop observations. In qualitative research, selection is<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!