16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Chapter One I described the sequence <strong>of</strong>events that led to my <strong>in</strong>volvement with the<br />

community <strong>of</strong>EMS teachers. Ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g entry <strong>in</strong>to the group <strong>of</strong>EMS teachers facilitated<br />

my eventual access to schools. The feedback that I received from teachers dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial workshop evaluation session <strong>in</strong>dicated that there was a need for regular workshops.<br />

It also confirmed the notion that teachers teach<strong>in</strong>g EMS were <strong>in</strong> fact struggl<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

develop and teach the EMS curriculum. The absence <strong>of</strong>subject content knowledge <strong>in</strong><br />

EMS appeared to be the ma<strong>in</strong> difficulty that EMS teachers experienced.<br />

4.6.2 A way around gatekeepers<br />

In ethnography, the term 'gatekeeper' is referred to as the person who is able to grant<br />

access to the research site. Once I had ga<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>itial acceptance by the participat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

teachers, ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g access to the schools became an easier task. The pr<strong>in</strong>cipals <strong>of</strong>all five<br />

participat<strong>in</strong>g schools, hav<strong>in</strong>g received positive feedback about the <strong>in</strong>itial EMS workshop,<br />

were very receptive <strong>of</strong>me and were keen to learn more about the project. Educational<br />

researchers must learn to 'sell' themselves and their research more effectively (Walford<br />

2001). Researchers have to be clear how the research project can be 'sold' to those who<br />

can grant access and clarify what the potential benefits are to them. Researchers have to<br />

be clear about what benefits researchers, the process <strong>of</strong>research, and the research<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs themselves can <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

The researcher must use the <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terview to quell any doubts that the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal may<br />

have about the research (ibid.). Issues <strong>of</strong>confidentiality and anonymity must be<br />

discussed. It is important to plan how one presents oneselfat access meet<strong>in</strong>gs. It is crucial<br />

to make a good first impression with gatekeepers (Delamont 2002). Attention needs to be<br />

paid to dress and hairstyle and to what personal <strong>in</strong>fonnation one divulges. I made a po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

<strong>of</strong>be<strong>in</strong>g formally dressed, wear<strong>in</strong>g formal pants with collared shirt. This proved to be<br />

important as all the pr<strong>in</strong>cipals <strong>in</strong> the participat<strong>in</strong>g schools were always formally dressed<br />

and presented <strong>of</strong>ficial and bus<strong>in</strong>esslike dispositions at the <strong>in</strong>itial meet<strong>in</strong>gs. My<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction to the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>of</strong>Eden Primary School was a critical po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the project. At<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!