16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Here Beth expla<strong>in</strong>ed the difficult circumstances under which she had to teach, cit<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> support from teachers with<strong>in</strong> her school for the new curriculum. She described<br />

teachers' resistance to the new curriculum and negative perceptions there<strong>of</strong>. Harley and<br />

Wedek<strong>in</strong>d (2004) posit that teacher support for C200S is uneven and stems from support<br />

for C200S as a 'political project', that is, its ability to deliver equity and redress. They<br />

refer to the anomalous situation <strong>in</strong> which teachers <strong>in</strong>dicate support for C200S, yet do not<br />

have a good understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>it.<br />

It was <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that Beth could identify with, and support, the <strong>in</strong>tentions <strong>of</strong><br />

C200S, that is the need to develop 'active' learners. She contrasted this with her own<br />

school experience <strong>in</strong> which she was a 'passive' learner. She could articulate the process<br />

that could unfold for group work but as will be discussed later, her subject matter<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong>EMS stifled her ability to teach EMS <strong>in</strong> the way she wanted. However,<br />

Beth rema<strong>in</strong>ed guardedly positive about the new curriculum.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>s' understand<strong>in</strong>gs and mean<strong>in</strong>gs are closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to their th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, attitudes and<br />

perceptions. In terms <strong>of</strong>teachers' th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, attitudes and perceptions regard<strong>in</strong>g the new<br />

curriculum, the vignettes <strong>in</strong>dicate that there was a dist<strong>in</strong>ct sense amongst teachers, that<br />

the new curriculum was not work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their classrooms and that there were several flaws<br />

that they had identified, such as the overemphasis on practical work at the expense <strong>of</strong><br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g read<strong>in</strong>g and writ<strong>in</strong>g skills. Beth <strong>in</strong> particular was able to embrace one <strong>of</strong>the<br />

design pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong>the new curriculum, namely, that <strong>of</strong>learner centeredness. While she<br />

could manipulate her teach<strong>in</strong>g to embrace the form (<strong>of</strong> learner centredness), she was<br />

unable to come to terms with the substance <strong>of</strong>this design pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. 2 With the exception<br />

<strong>of</strong>John and Beth, it was clear that teachers had developed negative perceptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new curriculum. The discussion that follows reveals how teachers had shifted <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

their th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, attitudes and perceptions <strong>of</strong>the new curriculum after their <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong><br />

theTEMS.<br />

2 Brodie, Lelliot and Davis (2002) refer to this as the tension between form and substance <strong>in</strong> learner centred<br />

practice.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!