16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

school staff development workshops or gather<strong>in</strong>gs where teachers with<strong>in</strong> a discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

meet to discuss issues. Other group formations may take place with<strong>in</strong> discipl<strong>in</strong>es or<br />

grades but across schools with<strong>in</strong> a particular geographical area.<br />

In a study <strong>of</strong> voluntary group<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong>teachers, Clark recognized that pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

conversation is the key to enhanc<strong>in</strong>g teachers' learn<strong>in</strong>g and that "authentic conversation"<br />

occurs when topics arise out <strong>of</strong>teachers' concerns about their work (Clark 2001: 177).<br />

"Authentic conversation is about mak<strong>in</strong>g sense <strong>of</strong>and articulat<strong>in</strong>g our own experiences,<br />

implicit theories, hopes, and fears, <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tellectual and emotional company <strong>of</strong>others<br />

whom we trust" (ibid.). Clark concludes that develop<strong>in</strong>g trust and generat<strong>in</strong>g authentic<br />

conversations only happen over an extended period <strong>of</strong>time (ibid.).<br />

<strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> communities have to go through an <strong>in</strong>itial phase which Grossman et al<br />

(2001:955) call a 'pseudocommunity'. They expla<strong>in</strong> the concept 'pseudocommunity' as<br />

a situation <strong>in</strong> which participants 'play community', that is, they act as ifthey are already<br />

a community that shares values and beliefs. Participants are congenial and friendly and<br />

sensitive not to <strong>in</strong>trude on issues <strong>of</strong>personal space. There is a def<strong>in</strong>ite attempt to suppress<br />

conflict, by not overtly challeng<strong>in</strong>g each other, thereby creat<strong>in</strong>g illusions <strong>of</strong>consensus.<br />

Because there is no rigour <strong>in</strong> discussions, participants "speak at high levels <strong>of</strong>generality<br />

that allows each to impute his or her own mean<strong>in</strong>g to the group's abstractions"<br />

(Grossman et al2001 :955). Participants perform identities that generally reflect<br />

positively on them. Other participants may try to achieve the aim <strong>of</strong>present<strong>in</strong>g<br />

themselves as victims who, through the expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>competence, seek the group's<br />

sympathy. Interactions <strong>in</strong> a pseudocommunity operate smoothly as long as each<br />

participant gets to play the role she wants without be<strong>in</strong>g challenged. The smooth<br />

function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>a pseudocommunity is challenged when participants meet more <strong>of</strong>ten and<br />

for longer periods for time. When this happens, <strong>in</strong>dividual participants' authenticity<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>s to be questioned (ibid.).<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!