16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER FIVE<br />

HOW HAD TEACHER LEARNING OCCURRED? CONSTRUCTING<br />

A WEBERIAN STYLE 'IDEAL TYPE'<br />

5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong>this study was to <strong>in</strong>vestigate Economic and Management Sciences (EMS)<br />

teachers' learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice, designed <strong>in</strong> accordance with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

<strong>of</strong> social practice theory (as espoused by Lave and Wenger 1991; Wenger 1998 and<br />

Wenger, McDennott and Snyder 2002). As outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3, the study drew<br />

primarily on Wenger's (1998) work, and used his conception <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g as constitut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

four essential components, namely, mean<strong>in</strong>g, community, practice and identity.<br />

As noted earlier, <strong>in</strong> South Africa teacher biographies and <strong>in</strong>dividual contexts are<br />

compell<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong> teacher development. These factors were also important <strong>in</strong> this<br />

study, as they represented significant determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong>the extent <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual 'learn<strong>in</strong>g'.<br />

Wenger's work <strong>of</strong>fers limited <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the development/learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong>practice. In this research the work <strong>of</strong>Bourdieu (1986) is<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>gly drawn on to supplement our understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>the <strong>in</strong>dividual dimension.<br />

Although Bourdieu (ibid.) did not address learn<strong>in</strong>g directly, his constructs, namely,<br />

economic capital, social capital and cultural capital were useful <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

analys<strong>in</strong>g factors that contributed to or impeded the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

community <strong>of</strong>practice. Differences <strong>in</strong> 'capital' <strong>in</strong> all its forms certa<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals' levels <strong>of</strong>participation and learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the TEMS community. This analysis<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Section 5.7.<br />

The decision as to how to proceed with the data analysis and its subsequent presentation<br />

was <strong>in</strong>deed a challeng<strong>in</strong>g one. While Wenger's (1998) work <strong>of</strong>fered a theoretical<br />

framework and the conceptual tools, the dilemma as to how to apply Wenger's<br />

framework to the data that was gathered was a matter that needed to be resolved. Various<br />

options for the data analysis and presentation were explored, each present<strong>in</strong>g particular<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!