16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that the Wenger framework presents is to <strong>in</strong>corporate the broader issues <strong>of</strong> social and<br />

economic <strong>in</strong>equalities that may exist beyond the actual site <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g, fully <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g. This is particularly significant <strong>in</strong> a South African context<br />

characterised by widespread social and economic <strong>in</strong>equalities.<br />

The model does not <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>in</strong>sights for expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g discont<strong>in</strong>uities <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g that stem<br />

from unequal access to learn<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Learn<strong>in</strong>g</strong> opportunities may depend on an <strong>in</strong>dividual's<br />

status with<strong>in</strong> a community. In learn<strong>in</strong>g communities more powerful members are able to<br />

ga<strong>in</strong> greater access to learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities. The model does not acknowledge that the<br />

development <strong>of</strong>the <strong>in</strong>dividual needs to be viewed as a negotiated process that is<br />

subjected to both facilitative and oppressive forces that may exist with<strong>in</strong> and beyond the<br />

community <strong>of</strong>practice.<br />

Wenger's model <strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong>practice presents an account <strong>of</strong>learn<strong>in</strong>g based on the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong>a group-referenced identity. For Wenger, the group represents the primary<br />

unit <strong>of</strong>analysis, where learn<strong>in</strong>g becomes <strong>in</strong>separable from forms <strong>of</strong>social engagement.<br />

Explor<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual member's learn<strong>in</strong>g trajectory is difficult us<strong>in</strong>g Wenger's model,<br />

as the model does not provide adequate tools for such analysis. This is significant, as a<br />

key barrier to learn<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> fact discont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>in</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g trajectory. In a teacher<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g community, assess<strong>in</strong>g the learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>an <strong>in</strong>dividual teacher presents a challenge,<br />

as Wenger's model is silent on this issue. Wenger fails to deal adequately with teachers<br />

as <strong>in</strong>dividuals despite the explicit focus on identity. Understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

dispositions and personalities and how they play themselves out <strong>in</strong> a learn<strong>in</strong>g community<br />

are ignored <strong>in</strong> the model. The social approach to learn<strong>in</strong>g presented by Wenger is at the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong>the way <strong>in</strong>dividual members <strong>of</strong>a community <strong>of</strong>practice learn.<br />

While Wenger acknowledges the reflexive transformation <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> a community<br />

<strong>of</strong>practice, he does not <strong>of</strong>fer a framework to explore how this occurs. The challenge then<br />

is to theorise a model that <strong>in</strong>tegrates <strong>in</strong>dividual members' learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a community <strong>of</strong><br />

practice.<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!