16.08.2013 Views

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

Teacher Learning in a Community of Practice: A Case Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

try to make sense <strong>of</strong>their worlds through <strong>in</strong>terviews. Interviews provide an occasion to<br />

present a reasonably rational image <strong>of</strong>their uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty (ibid.).<br />

Often it may be very time consum<strong>in</strong>g to wait for <strong>in</strong>formation to be generated <strong>in</strong> naturally<br />

occurr<strong>in</strong>g situations. Some <strong>in</strong>formation might not be generated <strong>in</strong> naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

situations no matter how long the researcher waits. The <strong>in</strong>terview therefore gives the<br />

chance for particular questions to be asked that cannot be asked <strong>in</strong> any other situation.<br />

This type <strong>of</strong>situation is reasonable for the use <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>terviews as long as the results are<br />

treated with sufficient scepticism (Walford 2001).<br />

Qualitative researchers <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> participant observation can be easily 'seduced' by the<br />

tape-recorded <strong>in</strong>terview. Participant observation can be a frustrat<strong>in</strong>g experience that<br />

requires patience to sit and wait for data to be generated. In contrast, a tape-recorded<br />

<strong>in</strong>terview provides immediate 'hard' data <strong>in</strong> the "... s<strong>of</strong>t, uncomfortably <strong>in</strong>secure and<br />

always uncerta<strong>in</strong> world <strong>of</strong>qualitative research" (Walford 2001 :93). Delamont (2002: 122)<br />

strongly supports the use <strong>of</strong> observational research as superior to other forms <strong>of</strong>data<br />

collection methods, and declares:<br />

I am totally conv<strong>in</strong>ced that observational data, gathered over a long period <strong>of</strong>immersion,<br />

are superior to any others. The fashion for replac<strong>in</strong>g proper fieldwork with either<br />

unstructured <strong>in</strong>terviews or focus groups or the collection <strong>of</strong>narratives... is thoroughly<br />

bad. Such data are only <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g or useful to provide foreshadowed problems before<br />

observation or extra <strong>in</strong>sight after it. Proper fieldwork is time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>terview<strong>in</strong>g is a<br />

quick fix. Proper fieldwork is like a casserole: it should simmer for a long time at low<br />

heat. Interview<strong>in</strong>g is a take-away chow me<strong>in</strong>; it lacks authenticity and does not satisfy for<br />

long - 'data to go'.<br />

With regard to transcrib<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviews, there can be no firm rules about transcription<br />

(Walford 2001). There is no need to fully transcribe more than a few <strong>in</strong>terviews for any<br />

research study. Researchers could listen to the whole <strong>of</strong> each tape us<strong>in</strong>g a tape player<br />

with a counter. It is <strong>of</strong>ten more useful to conduct the analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al tape<br />

record<strong>in</strong>gs rather than the transcripts (ibid.). The tape record<strong>in</strong>g itselfis not an accurate<br />

record <strong>of</strong>a conversation, as even the most thorough transcription cannot capture the<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!