02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

limits <strong>of</strong> sensibility” (CPR Bxxv). “Pure reason” Kant writes “is here considered in its practical<br />

use, and consequently as proceeding from a priori principles and not from empirical determining<br />

grounds” (CPrR 5:90). The will becomes a higher will that can determine itself when it is<br />

determined by reason. “And thus either there is no higher faculty <strong>of</strong> desire at all or else pure<br />

reason must be practical <strong>of</strong> itself and alone, that is, it must be able to determine the will by the<br />

mere form <strong>of</strong> practical rule without presupposing any feeling and hence without any<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> the agreeable or disagreeable as the matter <strong>of</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> desire, which is<br />

always an empirical condition” (CPrR 5:25). Kant also puts this point in positive terms. “Then<br />

only, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as reason <strong>of</strong> itself (not in the service <strong>of</strong> inclinations) determines the will, is reason a<br />

true higher faculty <strong>of</strong> desire, to which the pathologically determinable is subordinate, and the<br />

only is reason really, and indeed specifically, distinct from the latter, so that even the least<br />

admixture <strong>of</strong> the latter’s impulses infringes upon its strength and superiority, just as anything at<br />

all empirical as a condition in a mathematical demonstration degrades and destroys its dignity<br />

and force” (CPrR 5:25). But in what sense does reason determine the will?<br />

“Reason therefore provides laws which are imperatives, that is, objective laws <strong>of</strong><br />

freedom, which tell us what ought to happen—although perhaps it never does happen—therein<br />

differing from laws <strong>of</strong> nature, which relate only to that which happens. These laws are therefore<br />

to be entitled practical laws” (CPR A802/B830). That reason tells what ought to happen rather<br />

than what does happen demonstrates that reason is autonomy. “Autonomy <strong>of</strong> the will is the sole<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> all moral laws and <strong>of</strong> duties in keeping with them; heteronomy <strong>of</strong> choice, on the<br />

other hand, not only does not ground any obligation at all but is instead opposed to the principle<br />

<strong>of</strong> obligation and to the morality <strong>of</strong> the will. That is to say, the sole principle <strong>of</strong> morality consists<br />

in independence from all matter <strong>of</strong> the law (namely from a desired object) and at the same time<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!