02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

his necessary connection to the univocal being. The Overman is the individual who is never fully<br />

individuated. He is the passive self who at the same time has the capacity to say ‘I.’ It is for this<br />

reason that the Overman is the perfect individual to unify the faculties while preserving their<br />

differences. In other words, he is the perfect individual to be the paradoxical unity <strong>of</strong> open<br />

faculties, that is faculties that encounters their own Ideas.<br />

If the most important faculty for the Cogito is the faculty <strong>of</strong> the understanding, the most<br />

important faculty for the Overman is the sensibility. In other words, the Overman can be the<br />

paradoxical unity <strong>of</strong> faculties precisely because he synthesizes sensibly. For this reason, it ought<br />

not to surprise us that the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility becomes the most important faculty for Deleuze.<br />

“It is true that on the path which leads to that which is to be thought, all begins with sensibility”<br />

(DR 144). Deleuze priorities the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility, because sensibility is the faculty that is<br />

developed precisely in this encounter such that its form is not different from its matter. “In effect,<br />

the intensive or difference in intensity is at once both the object <strong>of</strong> the encounter and the object<br />

to which the encounter raises sensibility” (DR 144-5). This is what it means to say that repetition<br />

repeats the power <strong>of</strong> difference. “The privilege <strong>of</strong> sensibility as origin appears in the fact that, in<br />

an encounter, what forces sensation and that which can only be sensed are one and the same<br />

thing…” (DR 144-5). In this sense, the thing that each faculty encounters from its own<br />

perspective is actually what the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility encounters from its own perspective. For<br />

this reason, Deleuze can advance the controversial claim against Kant that what sensibility<br />

senses just is the Idea. In other words, that the intuitions without concepts are not blind but that<br />

they can see also means that the Idea is not transcendent, but is rather immanent. It is what we<br />

sense outside the concept. When the faculties are dislodged from the Cogito they fall back into<br />

the one and the same univocal being. However, for each <strong>of</strong> those faculties that one and the same<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!