02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that relates it to extended space and subordinates it to the qualities that fill space” (Smith 1996<br />

36). Smith frames his point in terms <strong>of</strong> conscious perception. “A ‘sign’…is an intensity produced<br />

by the asymmetry <strong>of</strong> the differential relations, whereas a ‘quality’ appears when an intensity<br />

reaches a given order or magnitude and these relations are organized in consciousness” (Smith<br />

1996 36). This way <strong>of</strong> framing the issue is helpful. When the sensible being such as a sound<br />

comes to consciousness it means that it has been conceptualized. In other words, the passive self<br />

has become the Cogito. “This notion <strong>of</strong> the differential Idea finds its complement in the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> intensity: these elements and relations are necessarily actualized in intensive magnitudes”<br />

(Smith 1996 36). But everything changes when the passive self becomes the Overman, in other<br />

words, when the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility is dislodged from the faculty <strong>of</strong> the understanding. In this<br />

case the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility really does encounter its own Idea, that is, it really does encounter<br />

intensity. “This element is intensity, understood as pure difference in itself, as that which is at<br />

once both imperceptible for empirical sensibility which grasps intensity only already covered or<br />

mediated by the quality to which it gives rise, and at the same time that which can be perceived<br />

only from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a transcendental sensibility which apprehends it immediately in<br />

the encounter” (DR 144). Deleuze argues that the Idea <strong>of</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility, namely<br />

intensity is what produces the faculty <strong>of</strong> sensibility such that it can then come under the faculty<br />

<strong>of</strong> the understanding. “Sensibility, in the present <strong>of</strong> that which can only be sensed (and is at the<br />

same time imperceptible) finds itself before its own limit, the sign, and raises itself to the level <strong>of</strong><br />

a transcendental exercise: to the ‘nth’ power” (DR 140). We can say that it is only when we hear<br />

unconsciously that we can hear consciously. We can say that we consciously hear this or that<br />

noise, precisely because we unconsciously hear the white noise that produces all the other<br />

consciously heard noises (Smith 1996 36).<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!