02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What is a faculty?<br />

Empirical knowledge or what Kant also calls experience is composed <strong>of</strong> two elements. “For it<br />

may well be that even our empirical knowledge is made up <strong>of</strong> what we receive through<br />

impressions and <strong>of</strong> what our own faculty <strong>of</strong> knowledge (sensible impressions serving merely as<br />

the occasion) supplies from itself” (CPR B2). Kant puts the distinction between the two elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> experience in terms <strong>of</strong> matter and form. “That experience contains two very dissimilar<br />

elements, namely, the matter <strong>of</strong> knowledge [obtained] from the senses, and a certain form for the<br />

ordering <strong>of</strong> this matter, [obtained] from the inner source <strong>of</strong> the pure intuition and thought which,<br />

on occasion <strong>of</strong> the sense-impressions, are first brought into action and yield concepts” (CPR<br />

B118/A86). This distinction between the matter and the form is in fact the most basic distinction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Critique <strong>of</strong> Pure Reason. However, it is not on this distinction that Kant focuses this work.<br />

Instead, what primarily interests Kant is just one <strong>of</strong> these elements <strong>of</strong> experience. “If our faculty<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge makes any such [formal] addition, it may be that we are not in a position to<br />

distinguish it from the raw material, until with long practice <strong>of</strong> attention we have become skilled<br />

in separating it” (CPR B2). In an important sense, the Critique <strong>of</strong> Pure Reason is that long<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> attention. And this is how Kant defines the task <strong>of</strong> the Critique <strong>of</strong> Pure Reason: “for<br />

the chief question is always simply this:–what and how much can the understanding and reason<br />

know apart from all experience?” (CPR Axvii). In other words, that the Critique <strong>of</strong> Pure Reason<br />

is the study <strong>of</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> experience means that it is a study <strong>of</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> knowledge or <strong>of</strong><br />

the various faculties that compose it. What is a faculty?<br />

Perhaps we get a sense for what a faculty is if we consider the exact role it plays in<br />

experience. I have already quoted the following sentence. “For it may well be that even our<br />

empirical knowledge is made up <strong>of</strong> what we receive through impressions and <strong>of</strong> what our own<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!