02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with which it is invested” (DR 85). But what have we forgotten? Reminiscence constitutes the<br />

pure past in the living present in terms <strong>of</strong> the Platonic Idea. “For the latter [the second syn<strong>thesis</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> time], from the height <strong>of</strong> its pure past, surpassed and dominated the world <strong>of</strong> representation: it<br />

is the ground, the in-itself, noumenon and Form” (DR 88). What does this mean? The pure past is<br />

the power in the living present or a way <strong>of</strong> being that makes it pass to another. However, that<br />

reminiscence constitutes pure time in the living present in terms <strong>of</strong> the Platonic Idea means that it<br />

invests that power with the Platonic Idea that the living presents resembles. For this reason, the<br />

living present or a way <strong>of</strong> being passes to another only by means <strong>of</strong> resemblance. “Nevertheless,<br />

is it really Kant’s prestigious contribution to have introduced time into thought as such? Platonic<br />

reminiscence would seem already to have implied this...But the question: In what form does<br />

reminiscence introduce time?” (DR 87). Reminiscences constitutes the pure past in the living<br />

present as the power <strong>of</strong> time to return to its forgotten, mythical past. This is how the passive self<br />

becomes the Cogito. It acts in terms <strong>of</strong> the Good. In this sense, reminiscence constitutes time as<br />

circle. “The Ideas none the less remain the ground on which the successive presents are<br />

organized into the circle <strong>of</strong> time, so that the pure past which defines them is itself still necessarily<br />

expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> a present, as an ancient mythical present” (DR 88). In this sense,<br />

reminiscence betrays pure time at the same time that it constitutes it. The question that Deleuze<br />

asks is: is there a faithful way <strong>of</strong> constituting the pure past? Is there a faithful way <strong>of</strong> constituting<br />

the power <strong>of</strong> time that makes the living present or a way <strong>of</strong> being pass to another? Is there a<br />

faithful way <strong>of</strong> constituting time as becoming? “Unless we have not yet found the last word,<br />

unless there is a third syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> time...” (DR 85).<br />

Reminiscence betrays the pure past in the sense that it hinges it to the Platonic Idea. It is<br />

the Platonic Idea that orders the passage <strong>of</strong> a living present or a way <strong>of</strong> being to another. “The<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!