02.09.2013 Views

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

stankovic, sasa thesis.pdf - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

can in some sense live the being in itself <strong>of</strong> the past in the same way that we live the passive<br />

syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> habit” (DR 84). In other words, Deleuze asks, how we can constitute time as pure<br />

past in the way we constitute time as the living present in contemplation. “The entire past is<br />

conserved in itself, but how can we save it for ourselves, how can we penetrate that in itself<br />

without reducing it to the former present that it was, or to the present present in relation to which<br />

it is past? How can we save it for ourselves?” (DR 84). It is crucial to remember here that<br />

Deleuze does not give one answer to this question, but rather two. These are reminiscence, the<br />

second syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> time, and the eternal return, the third syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> time. Let us look at each <strong>of</strong><br />

these two syntheses <strong>of</strong> time in relation to the first syntheses <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

“Moreover, it seems that the response has long been known: reminiscence. In effect, this<br />

designates a passive syn<strong>thesis</strong>, an involuntary memory which differs in kind from any active<br />

syn<strong>thesis</strong> associated with voluntary memory” (DR 84-5). Reminiscence is different than active<br />

memory to the extent that it is does not reminisce anything that ever actually was. Instead,<br />

reminiscence reminisces the pure past or the power <strong>of</strong> passage <strong>of</strong> living presents. “Combray<br />

reappears, not as it was or as it could be, but in a splendour which was never lived, like a pure<br />

past which finally reveals its double irreducibility to the two presents which it telescopes<br />

together: the present that it was, but also the present present which it could be” (DR 85). In this<br />

sense, if contemplation is one syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> the passive self, reminiscence is another. In other<br />

words, reminiscence is a different kind <strong>of</strong> contraction or repetition than contemplation. “If we<br />

compare the passive syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> habit and the passive syn<strong>thesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> memory, we see how much<br />

the distribution <strong>of</strong> repetition and contraction changes from one to the other” (DR 82).<br />

Contemplation is a contraction or a repetition <strong>of</strong> independent instants into a living present.<br />

However, reminiscence is a contraction or a repetition <strong>of</strong> the pure past into a living present. “No<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!